← Current week Game Center
AwayNavyNo. 76 · -2.2
4M projection
Away27–Home27
Pick'em50% win
HomeArmyNo. 77 · -2.3
Week 15Saturday, December 12 at 3:00 PM ESTCBSMetLife Stadium7-day forecast pending
DraftKings marketArmy +2.5 · O/U 37.5Details
Live sportsbookDraftKingsUpdated Sep 5, 10:57 AM ET
SpreadArmy +2.5 -110Navy -2.5 -110
TotalOver 37.5 -108Under 37.5 -112
MoneylineArmy +120Navy -142
OpeningArmy +2.5O/U 37.5 · No spread move
Model lean
Over 37.5 is the current model lean.

4M projects Army 27 · Navy 27 while DraftKings lists Army +2.5. That creates 2.5 points of difference toward Army.

See the betting translation ↓
10-second readLatest updateNo material market, weather or availability alert in the current snapshot. · Sep 5, 10:57 AM ET
Projected result
Navy 27–27

Navy has a 50% win chance in a toss-up matchup.

Key matchup
Army · Quarterback

Army leads this category, but Navy still leads the complete model.

Biggest concernTurnovers and explosive plays can flip it.

Army needs short fields or a possession advantage to break the expected script.

Game shapeToss-up
Expected styleAverage pace · Average-scoring
Projected pace12.0 possessions per team
Forecast snapshotNavy leads the modelToss-up · Average pace
4M fair linePick’em
Projected total54.2
Navy win50%
Projection confidence89%
Navy50% win
Army50% win

How the game projects

Navy owns the median outcome. Army needs the game to bend.

Why Navy winsTurn the offensive matchup edge into repeatable downs.

Expected efficiency and scoring leverage. Protect the football and make that advantage show up across full drives instead of isolated plays.

How Army winsMake quarterback decide the game.

Starter probability, production and continuity. Pair that advantage with short fields and explosive plays.

Read the full projection +

The model makes Navy the neutral-field leader after blending opponent-adjusted efficiency, predictive ratings, roster quality, returning production, portal impact and special teams. This game is priced as a true neutral site. The median score is Army 27 · Navy 27, with roughly 12.0 possessions per team.

This is a distribution, not a promise. Navy wins 50% of the outcome curve; the remaining probability captures turnovers, finishing-drive variance, injuries and early-season uncertainty.

Watch earlyThe opening signals that matter most
01Army · Quarterback

Does the strongest model advantage appear on the opening possessions?

02Average pace

12.0 possessions per team is the scoring baseline.

03Army · hidden possessions

Turnovers, short fields and explosive plays are the clearest upset path.

Why the model likes it

The matchup engine, from highlights to detail.

01 · Quarterback
Army
+23.0 indexStarter probability, production and continuity
02 · Offensive matchup
Navy
+19.0 indexExpected efficiency and scoring leverage
03 · Player value
Army
+16.9 indexRole-weighted returning and transfer production
Explore the matchup

Open only the part you want. Every figure is a matchup index—not a projected point adjustment.

Offense vs. defenseEfficiency, explosives and coverageNavy leads
Offensive efficiencyNavy

Expected scoring efficiency and early-down leverage across the two offenses.

+19.0 indexHigh confidence
NA
Defensive resistanceArmy

Opponent-adjusted prevention, disruption and finishing-drive defense.

+5.1 indexHigh confidence
NA
ReceiversArmy

Pass-game production, returning usage and depth against the opposing coverage unit.

+2.7 indexHigh confidence
NA
SecondaryArmy

Coverage experience and play prevention against the opposing passing attack.

0.0 indexHigh confidence
NA
Quarterback & personnelThe players most capable of moving the numberArmy leads
QuarterbackArmy

Starter probability, proven production, continuity and transfer translation.

+23.0 indexHigh confidence
NA
Player valueArmy

Role-weighted returning production and incoming transfer contribution.

+16.9 indexHigh confidence
NA
Roster qualityArmy

Recruiting baseline, usable depth and talent concentration at premium positions.

+16.1 indexHigh confidence
NA
Line of scrimmageProtection, disruption and field positionNavy leads
Offensive lineArmy

Returning line usage, protection stability and the ability to avoid negative plays.

0.0 indexHigh confidence
NA
Defensive frontArmy

Pressure, havoc and run disruption without needing extra defenders.

0.0 indexHigh confidence
NA
Special teamsNavy

Kicking, field position and hidden-yardage efficiency.

+5.8 indexHigh confidence
NA
EnvironmentNeutral-site, travel, rest and availabilityArmy leads
Neutral-site environmentArmy

MetLife Stadium is modeled as a true neutral site with no base home-field credit.

0.0 indexHigh confidence
NA
Travel & body clockArmy

Relative trip distance, time-zone change and local kickoff timing.

+0.1 indexHigh confidence
NA
RestArmy

Difference in recovery time entering the game.

0.0 indexHigh confidence
NA
AvailabilityArmy

Verified injury and availability reports applied as a live overlay.

0.0 indexHigh confidence
NA
How 4M built the fair linePick’emView the number bridge +
Neutral marginArmy -0.1Team strength before location
Base home field0.0True neutral site
Venue + altitude0.0Learned history, capacity and elevation
Travel + body clock+0.1Relative trip and kickoff timing
Rest0.0Days-between-games difference
Live availability0.0Verified personnel overlay

The location calculation combines the learned national baseline with venue and conference history, capacity, altitude, travel, body clock and rest. The archived team ratings remain neutral-field numbers.

Personnel file

Continuity, transfers and the people who can move the number.

NavyBrian Newberry
131 returners0 additions3 departures
Top modeled impact
  1. Braxton WoodsonQB · Returning3.1
  2. Luke HutchisonWR · Returning0.7
  3. Michael BarrowWR · Returning0.7
Full team dossier →
ArmyJeff Monken
126 returners0 additions2 departures
Top modeled impact
  1. Cale HellumsQB · Returning5.0
  2. Brady AndersonWR · Returning0.7
  3. Samari HowardWR · Returning0.7
Full team dossier →

Market translation

Over 37.5.

Model leanOver 37.5 is the current model lean.

A model direction, not an official tracked wager.

Current price · DraftKingsArmy +2.5O/U 37.5
4M fair lineArmy PKProjected total 54.2
Current difference2.5 ptsArmy side
Bet thresholdOver 51.2 or lower5.0-point side requirement
Primary riskVariance beats the baselineTurnovers, explosive plays and late availability
Model vs. market detailsSee the calculation, audits and pregame line movement+
Independent line comparison2.5-point difference
Market+2.54MPK
Army sideNavy side

The 4M line remains independent. A difference becomes actionable only when it clears the required edge and the availability, weather and disagreement audits.

What needs to happen: the projected unit advantages must survive first down and the turnover margin must stay near even. After kickoff, both the model and market comparison stay frozen.

Schedule context

What comes immediately before and after this matchup.