← Current week Game Center
AwayAuburnNo. 26 · +9.7
4M projection
Away21–Home28
Home -6.664% win
HomeAlabamaNo. 11 · +15.9
Week 13Saturday, November 28 at 12:00 AM ESTNetwork TBABryant-Denny Stadium7-day forecast pending
DraftKings marketAlabama -10 · O/U 52.5Details
Live sportsbookDraftKingsUpdated Sep 5, 10:57 AM ET
SpreadAlabama -10 -110Auburn +10 -110
TotalOver 52.5 -110Under 52.5 -110
MoneylineAlabama -425Auburn +330
OpeningAlabama -10O/U 53.5 · No spread move
Model lean
Under 52.5 is the current model lean.

4M projects Alabama 28 · Auburn 21 while DraftKings lists Alabama -10. That creates 3.4 points of difference toward Auburn.

See the betting translation ↓
10-second readLatest updateNo material market, weather or availability alert in the current snapshot. · Sep 5, 10:57 AM ET
Projected result
Alabama 28–21

Alabama has a 64% win chance in a competitive matchup.

Key matchup
Alabama · Offensive matchup

Expected efficiency and scoring leverage is the clearest advantage supporting the projection.

Biggest concernTurnovers and explosive plays can flip it.

Auburn needs short fields or a possession advantage to break the expected script.

Game shapeCompetitive
Expected styleAverage pace · Average-scoring
Projected pace12.0 possessions per team
Forecast snapshotAlabama leads the modelCompetitive · Average pace
4M fair lineAlabama -6.6
Projected total49.5
Alabama win64%
Projection confidence85%
Auburn36% win
Alabama64% win

How the game projects

Alabama owns the median outcome. Auburn needs the game to bend.

Why Alabama winsTurn the offensive matchup edge into repeatable downs.

Expected efficiency and scoring leverage. Protect the football and make that advantage show up across full drives instead of isolated plays.

How Auburn winsMake quarterback decide the game.

Starter probability, production and continuity. Pair that advantage with short fields and explosive plays.

Read the full projection +

The model makes Alabama the neutral-field leader after blending opponent-adjusted efficiency, predictive ratings, roster quality, returning production, portal impact and special teams. The complete environment contributes +2.4 points toward the home-team margin. The median score is Alabama 28 · Auburn 21, with roughly 12.0 possessions per team.

This is a distribution, not a promise. Alabama wins 64% of the outcome curve; the remaining probability captures turnovers, finishing-drive variance, injuries and early-season uncertainty.

Watch earlyThe opening signals that matter most
01Alabama · Offensive matchup

Does the strongest model advantage appear on the opening possessions?

02Average pace

12.0 possessions per team is the scoring baseline.

03Auburn · hidden possessions

Turnovers, short fields and explosive plays are the clearest upset path.

Why the model likes it

The matchup engine, from highlights to detail.

01 · Offensive matchup
Alabama
+12.6 indexExpected efficiency and scoring leverage
02 · Quarterback
Auburn
+7.6 indexStarter probability, production and continuity
03 · Player value
Auburn
+7.5 indexRole-weighted returning and transfer production
Explore the matchup

Open only the part you want. Every figure is a matchup index—not a projected point adjustment.

Offense vs. defenseEfficiency, explosives and coverageAlabama leads
Offensive efficiencyAlabama

Expected scoring efficiency and early-down leverage across the two offenses.

+12.6 indexMedium confidence
AA
Defensive resistanceAuburn

Opponent-adjusted prevention, disruption and finishing-drive defense.

+4.5 indexMedium confidence
AA
ReceiversAlabama

Pass-game production, returning usage and depth against the opposing coverage unit.

+3.3 indexMedium confidence
AA
SecondaryAlabama

Coverage experience and play prevention against the opposing passing attack.

0.0 indexMedium confidence
AA
Quarterback & personnelThe players most capable of moving the numberAuburn leads
QuarterbackAuburn

Starter probability, proven production, continuity and transfer translation.

+7.6 indexMedium confidence
AA
Player valueAuburn

Role-weighted returning production and incoming transfer contribution.

+7.5 indexMedium confidence
AA
Roster qualityAlabama

Recruiting baseline, usable depth and talent concentration at premium positions.

+3.7 indexMedium confidence
AA
Line of scrimmageProtection, disruption and field positionAuburn leads
Offensive lineAlabama

Returning line usage, protection stability and the ability to avoid negative plays.

0.0 indexMedium confidence
AA
Defensive frontAlabama

Pressure, havoc and run disruption without needing extra defenders.

0.0 indexMedium confidence
AA
Special teamsAuburn

Kicking, field position and hidden-yardage efficiency.

+21.7 indexMedium confidence
AA
EnvironmentHome field, travel, weather and availabilityAlabama leads
Home environmentAlabama

Alabama's learned home baseline, venue history, capacity and altitude at Bryant-Denny Stadium.

+2.4 indexMedium confidence
AA
Travel & body clockAlabama

Relative trip distance, time-zone change and local kickoff timing.

+0.1 indexMedium confidence
AA
RestAlabama

Difference in recovery time entering the game.

+0.0 indexMedium confidence
AA
AvailabilityAlabama

Verified injury and availability reports applied as a live overlay.

0.0 indexMedium confidence
AA
How 4M built the fair lineAlabama -6.6View the number bridge +
Neutral marginAlabama +4.2Team strength before location
Base home field+2.0National home baseline
Venue + altitude+0.4Learned history, capacity and elevation
Travel + body clock+0.1Relative trip and kickoff timing
Rest+0.0Days-between-games difference
Live availability0.0Verified personnel overlay

The location calculation combines the learned national baseline with venue and conference history, capacity, altitude, travel, body clock and rest. The archived team ratings remain neutral-field numbers.

Personnel file

Continuity, transfers and the people who can move the number.

AuburnAlex Golesh · new staff
52 returners39 additions39 departures
Top modeled impact
  1. Byrum BrownQB · Transfer in from South Florida4.2
  2. Tristan Ti'aQB · Transfer in from Oregon State0.9
  3. Chas NimrodWR · Transfer in from South Florida0.7
Full team dossier →
AlabamaKalen DeBoer
66 returners17 additions24 departures
Top modeled impact
  1. Austin MackQB · Returning4.2
  2. Ryan Coleman-WilliamsWR · Returning0.8
  3. Lotzeir BrooksWR · Returning0.7
Full team dossier →

Market translation

Under 52.5.

Model leanUnder 52.5 is the current model lean.

A model direction, not an official tracked wager.

Current price · DraftKingsAlabama -10O/U 52.5
4M fair lineAlabama -6.6Projected total 49.5
Current difference3.4 ptsAuburn side
Bet thresholdAuburn +11.6 or better5.0-point side requirement
Primary riskVariance beats the baselineTurnovers, explosive plays and late availability
Model vs. market detailsSee the calculation, audits and pregame line movement+
Independent line comparison3.4-point difference
Market-104M-6.6
Alabama sideAuburn side

The 4M line remains independent. A difference becomes actionable only when it clears the required edge and the availability, weather and disagreement audits.

What needs to happen: the projected unit advantages must survive first down and the turnover margin must stay near even. After kickoff, both the model and market comparison stay frozen.

Schedule context

What comes immediately before and after this matchup.