← Current week Game Center
AwayMississippi StateNo. 55 · +2.2
4M projection
Away20–Home33
Home -12.275% win
HomeOle MissNo. 12 · +15.6
Week 13Friday, November 27 at 12:00 PM ESTABCVaught-Hemingway Stadium7-day forecast pending
DraftKings marketOle Miss -14.5 · O/U 57.5Details
Live sportsbookDraftKingsUpdated Sep 5, 7:22 PM ET
SpreadOle Miss -14.5 -110Mississippi State +14.5 -110
TotalOver 57.5 -105Under 57.5 -115
MoneylineOle Miss -600Mississippi State +440
OpeningOle Miss -14.5O/U 56.5 · No spread move
Model lean
Under 57.5 is the current model lean.

4M projects Ole Miss 33 · Mississippi State 20 while DraftKings lists Ole Miss -14.5. That creates 2.3 points of difference toward Mississippi State.

See the betting translation ↓
10-second readLatest updateNo material market, weather or availability alert in the current snapshot. · Sep 5, 7:22 PM ET
Projected result
Ole Miss 33–20

Ole Miss has a 75% win chance in a clear edge matchup.

Key matchup
Ole Miss · Offensive matchup

Expected efficiency and scoring leverage is the clearest advantage supporting the projection.

Biggest concernTurnovers and explosive plays can flip it.

Mississippi State needs short fields or a possession advantage to break the expected script.

Game shapeClear edge
Expected styleAverage pace · Average-scoring
Projected pace12.0 possessions per team
Forecast snapshotOle Miss leads the modelClear edge · Average pace
4M fair lineOle Miss -12.2
Projected total53.0
Ole Miss win75%
Projection confidence89%
Mississippi State25% win
Ole Miss75% win

How the game projects

Ole Miss owns the median outcome. Mississippi State needs the game to bend.

Why Ole Miss winsTurn the offensive matchup edge into repeatable downs.

Expected efficiency and scoring leverage. Protect the football and make that advantage show up across full drives instead of isolated plays.

How Mississippi State winsMake quarterback decide the game.

Starter probability, production and continuity. Pair that advantage with short fields and explosive plays.

Read the full projection +

The model makes Ole Miss the neutral-field leader after blending opponent-adjusted efficiency, predictive ratings, roster quality, returning production, portal impact and special teams. The complete environment contributes +2.3 points toward the home-team margin. The median score is Ole Miss 33 · Mississippi State 20, with roughly 12.0 possessions per team.

This is a distribution, not a promise. Ole Miss wins 75% of the outcome curve; the remaining probability captures turnovers, finishing-drive variance, injuries and early-season uncertainty.

Watch earlyThe opening signals that matter most
01Ole Miss · Offensive matchup

Does the strongest model advantage appear on the opening possessions?

02Average pace

12.0 possessions per team is the scoring baseline.

03Mississippi State · hidden possessions

Turnovers, short fields and explosive plays are the clearest upset path.

Why the model likes it

The matchup engine, from highlights to detail.

01 · Offensive matchup
Ole Miss
+27.4 indexExpected efficiency and scoring leverage
02 · Quarterback
Mississippi State
+13.0 indexStarter probability, production and continuity
03 · Roster quality
Ole Miss
+4.4 indexTalent, depth and recruiting baseline
Explore the matchup

Open only the part you want. Every figure is a matchup index—not a projected point adjustment.

Offense vs. defenseEfficiency, explosives and coverageOle Miss leads
Offensive efficiencyOle Miss

Expected scoring efficiency and early-down leverage across the two offenses.

+27.4 indexHigh confidence
MSOM
Defensive resistanceOle Miss

Opponent-adjusted prevention, disruption and finishing-drive defense.

+2.8 indexHigh confidence
MSOM
ReceiversOle Miss

Pass-game production, returning usage and depth against the opposing coverage unit.

0.0 indexHigh confidence
MSOM
SecondaryOle Miss

Coverage experience and play prevention against the opposing passing attack.

0.0 indexHigh confidence
MSOM
Quarterback & personnelThe players most capable of moving the numberMississippi State leads
QuarterbackMississippi State

Starter probability, proven production, continuity and transfer translation.

+13.0 indexHigh confidence
MSOM
Player valueMississippi State

Role-weighted returning production and incoming transfer contribution.

+3.8 indexHigh confidence
MSOM
Roster qualityOle Miss

Recruiting baseline, usable depth and talent concentration at premium positions.

+4.4 indexHigh confidence
MSOM
Line of scrimmageProtection, disruption and field positionOle Miss leads
Offensive lineOle Miss

Returning line usage, protection stability and the ability to avoid negative plays.

0.0 indexHigh confidence
MSOM
Defensive frontOle Miss

Pressure, havoc and run disruption without needing extra defenders.

0.0 indexHigh confidence
MSOM
Special teamsOle Miss

Kicking, field position and hidden-yardage efficiency.

+26.9 indexHigh confidence
MSOM
EnvironmentHome field, travel, weather and availabilityOle Miss leads
Home environmentOle Miss

Ole Miss's learned home baseline, venue history, capacity and altitude at Vaught-Hemingway Stadium.

+2.3 indexHigh confidence
MSOM
Travel & body clockOle Miss

Relative trip distance, time-zone change and local kickoff timing.

+0.0 indexHigh confidence
MSOM
RestOle Miss

Difference in recovery time entering the game.

+0.0 indexHigh confidence
MSOM
AvailabilityOle Miss

Verified injury and availability reports applied as a live overlay.

0.0 indexHigh confidence
MSOM
How 4M built the fair lineOle Miss -12.2View the number bridge +
Neutral marginOle Miss +9.9Team strength before location
Base home field+2.0National home baseline
Venue + altitude+0.3Learned history, capacity and elevation
Travel + body clock+0.0Relative trip and kickoff timing
Rest+0.0Days-between-games difference
Live availability0.0Verified personnel overlay

The location calculation combines the learned national baseline with venue and conference history, capacity, altitude, travel, body clock and rest. The archived team ratings remain neutral-field numbers.

Personnel file

Continuity, transfers and the people who can move the number.

Mississippi StateJeff Lebby
50 returners28 additions40 departures
Top modeled impact
  1. AJ SwannQB · Transfer in from App State3.6
  2. Anthony Evans IIIWR · Returning0.9
  3. Kamario TaylorQB · Returning0.7
Full team dossier →
Ole MissPete Golding
64 returners28 additions27 departures
Top modeled impact
  1. Deuce KnightQB · Transfer in from Auburn3.0
  2. Trinidad ChamblissQB · Returning2.5
  3. Joshua DyeRB · Transfer in from Southern Utah0.9
Full team dossier →

Market translation

Under 57.5.

Model leanUnder 57.5 is the current model lean.

A model direction, not an official tracked wager.

Current price · DraftKingsOle Miss -14.5O/U 57.5
4M fair lineOle Miss -12.2Projected total 53.0
Current difference2.3 ptsMississippi State side
Bet thresholdUnder 56.0 or higher5.0-point side requirement
Primary riskVariance beats the baselineTurnovers, explosive plays and late availability
Model vs. market detailsSee the calculation, audits and pregame line movement+
Independent line comparison2.3-point difference
Market-14.54M-12.2
Ole Miss sideMississippi State side

The 4M line remains independent. A difference becomes actionable only when it clears the required edge and the availability, weather and disagreement audits.

What needs to happen: the projected unit advantages must survive first down and the turnover margin must stay near even. After kickoff, both the model and market comparison stay frozen.

Schedule context

What comes immediately before and after this matchup.