← Current week Game Center
AwayTennesseeNo. 15 · +14.0
4M projection
Away29–Home29
Home -0.351% win
HomeVanderbiltNo. 22 · +11.3
Week 13Saturday, November 28 at 12:00 AM ESTNetwork TBAFirstBank Stadium7-day forecast pending
DraftKings marketVanderbilt +3 · O/U 57.5Details
Live sportsbookDraftKingsUpdated Sep 5, 3:03 PM ET
SpreadVanderbilt +3 -110Tennessee -3 -110
TotalOver 57.5 -112Under 57.5 -108
MoneylineVanderbilt +136Tennessee -162
OpeningVanderbilt +3O/U 57.5 · No spread move
Pass
Pass at the current number.

4M projects Vanderbilt 29 · Tennessee 29 while DraftKings lists Vanderbilt +3. That creates 3.3 points of difference toward Vanderbilt.

See the betting translation ↓
10-second readLatest updateNo material market, weather or availability alert in the current snapshot. · Sep 5, 3:03 PM ET
Projected result
Vanderbilt 29–29

Vanderbilt has a 51% win chance in a toss-up matchup.

Key matchup
Tennessee · Quarterback

Tennessee leads this category, but Vanderbilt still leads the complete model.

Biggest concernTurnovers and explosive plays can flip it.

Tennessee needs short fields or a possession advantage to break the expected script.

Game shapeToss-up
Expected styleAverage pace · Average-scoring
Projected pace12.0 possessions per team
Forecast snapshotVanderbilt leads the modelToss-up · Average pace
4M fair lineVanderbilt -0.3
Projected total57.7
Vanderbilt win51%
Projection confidence85%
Tennessee49% win
Vanderbilt51% win

How the game projects

Vanderbilt owns the median outcome. Tennessee needs the game to bend.

Why Vanderbilt winsTurn the offensive matchup edge into repeatable downs.

Expected efficiency and scoring leverage. Protect the football and make that advantage show up across full drives instead of isolated plays.

How Tennessee winsMake quarterback decide the game.

Starter probability, production and continuity. Pair that advantage with short fields and explosive plays.

Read the full projection +

The model makes Vanderbilt the neutral-field leader after blending opponent-adjusted efficiency, predictive ratings, roster quality, returning production, portal impact and special teams. The complete environment contributes +2.1 points toward the home-team margin. The median score is Vanderbilt 29 · Tennessee 29, with roughly 12.0 possessions per team.

This is a distribution, not a promise. Vanderbilt wins 51% of the outcome curve; the remaining probability captures turnovers, finishing-drive variance, injuries and early-season uncertainty.

Watch earlyThe opening signals that matter most
01Tennessee · Quarterback

Does the strongest model advantage appear on the opening possessions?

02Average pace

12.0 possessions per team is the scoring baseline.

03Tennessee · hidden possessions

Turnovers, short fields and explosive plays are the clearest upset path.

Why the model likes it

The matchup engine, from highlights to detail.

01 · Quarterback
Tennessee
+29.8 indexStarter probability, production and continuity
02 · Player value
Tennessee
+23.0 indexRole-weighted returning and transfer production
03 · Offensive matchup
Vanderbilt
+21.6 indexExpected efficiency and scoring leverage
Explore the matchup

Open only the part you want. Every figure is a matchup index—not a projected point adjustment.

Offense vs. defenseEfficiency, explosives and coverageTennessee leads
Offensive efficiencyVanderbilt

Expected scoring efficiency and early-down leverage across the two offenses.

+21.6 indexMedium confidence
TV
Defensive resistanceVanderbilt

Opponent-adjusted prevention, disruption and finishing-drive defense.

+1.9 indexMedium confidence
TV
ReceiversTennessee

Pass-game production, returning usage and depth against the opposing coverage unit.

+10.6 indexMedium confidence
TV
SecondaryTennessee

Coverage experience and play prevention against the opposing passing attack.

+40.9 indexMedium confidence
TV
Quarterback & personnelThe players most capable of moving the numberTennessee leads
QuarterbackTennessee

Starter probability, proven production, continuity and transfer translation.

+29.8 indexMedium confidence
TV
Player valueTennessee

Role-weighted returning production and incoming transfer contribution.

+23.0 indexMedium confidence
TV
Roster qualityTennessee

Recruiting baseline, usable depth and talent concentration at premium positions.

+14.6 indexMedium confidence
TV
Line of scrimmageProtection, disruption and field positionVanderbilt leads
Offensive lineVanderbilt

Returning line usage, protection stability and the ability to avoid negative plays.

0.0 indexMedium confidence
TV
Defensive frontVanderbilt

Pressure, havoc and run disruption without needing extra defenders.

0.0 indexMedium confidence
TV
Special teamsVanderbilt

Kicking, field position and hidden-yardage efficiency.

+15.1 indexMedium confidence
TV
EnvironmentHome field, travel, weather and availabilityVanderbilt leads
Home environmentVanderbilt

Vanderbilt's learned home baseline, venue history, capacity and altitude at FirstBank Stadium.

+1.9 indexMedium confidence
TV
Travel & body clockVanderbilt

Relative trip distance, time-zone change and local kickoff timing.

+0.2 indexMedium confidence
TV
RestVanderbilt

Difference in recovery time entering the game.

0.0 indexMedium confidence
TV
AvailabilityVanderbilt

Verified injury and availability reports applied as a live overlay.

0.0 indexMedium confidence
TV
How 4M built the fair lineVanderbilt -0.3View the number bridge +
Neutral marginVanderbilt -1.9Team strength before location
Base home field+2.0National home baseline
Venue + altitude-0.0Learned history, capacity and elevation
Travel + body clock+0.2Relative trip and kickoff timing
Rest0.0Days-between-games difference
Live availability0.0Verified personnel overlay

The location calculation combines the learned national baseline with venue and conference history, capacity, altitude, travel, body clock and rest. The archived team ratings remain neutral-field numbers.

Personnel file

Continuity, transfers and the people who can move the number.

TennesseeJosh Heupel
58 returners21 additions29 departures
Top modeled impact
  1. Ryan StaubQB · Transfer in from Colorado5.0
  2. Braylon StaleyWR · Returning0.9
  3. Mike MatthewsWR · Returning0.8
Full team dossier →
VanderbiltClark Lea
68 returners18 additions19 departures
Top modeled impact
  1. Blaze BerlowitzQB · Returning3.0
  2. Jack ElliottQB · Returning0.9
  3. Whit MuschampQB · Returning0.9
Full team dossier →

Market translation

No automatic play.

PassPass at the current number.

The current price does not clear the model's required advantage.

Current price · DraftKingsVanderbilt +3O/U 57.5
4M fair lineVanderbilt -0.3Projected total 57.7
Current difference3.3 ptsVanderbilt side
Bet thresholdVanderbilt +4.7 or better5.0-point side requirement
Primary riskVariance beats the baselineTurnovers, explosive plays and late availability
Model vs. market detailsSee the calculation, audits and pregame line movement+
Independent line comparison3.3-point difference
Market+34M-0.3
Vanderbilt sideTennessee side

The 4M line remains independent. A difference becomes actionable only when it clears the required edge and the availability, weather and disagreement audits.

What needs to happen: the projected unit advantages must survive first down and the turnover margin must stay near even. After kickoff, both the model and market comparison stay frozen.

Schedule context

What comes immediately before and after this matchup.