← All 138 teams

No. 15 · SEC

Tennessee

Volunteers · 2026 preseason dossier

4M tierPlayoff4M-INTELLIGENCE-1.5
4M score750–100 index
Power rating+14.0vs. average
Projected wins6.5regular season
ScheduleNo. 141 = hardest
Playoff chance7.4%10,000 season sims
Inside the 4M numberFive ways this team can win—or get exposed.

Each index is standardized across FBS. Fifty is national average; context and matchup still decide the bet.

Offense73
Defense45
Roster65
Players70
Special teams51
Data confidence89%4M-INTELLIGENCE-1.5

The 2026 outlook

Can the roster hold its efficiency when the schedule produces SEC-level stress almost every week?

Tennessee opens No. 15 nationally and No. 7 of 16 in the SEC. The 4M baseline rates the roster 14.0 points above an average FBS team on a neutral field and projects 6.5 regular-season wins.

Tennessee has a credible playoff profile, but not enough separation to absorb repeated mistakes. Its best version can win a high-level matchup; the question is whether that version appears often enough to navigate the conference race without spending the playoff margin for error too early.

The roster grades comfortably above the national average. The personnel question is not whether there is talent; it is whether new starters can inherit the high-leverage jobs—quarterback decisions, pass protection, third-down coverage and pass-rush production—without an early efficiency drop.

The schedule is a defining variable: it projects No. 14 nationally, with No. 1 representing the hardest slate. Tennessee can play good football and still finish below public expectations if it loses the possession battles in its highest-leverage games. This is why the 6.5-win projection may look conservative relative to the power rating.

Personnel command center

Who is back, who arrived and who has to matter.

The roster is grouped by continuity because returning snaps and proven transfer production are more useful than raw headcount. “New / unverified” means the player did not match last season's roster or the incoming portal file—not that the player is necessarily a freshman.

Head coachJosh Heupel45–20 over the available CFBD career window
Staff continuityReturning head coachContinuity is treated as context, not an automatic upgrade.
Portal ledger21 in · 29 outImpact is weighted by rating, position and prior usage.
Position-group modelPremium roles separated.Fifty is FBS average. Quarterback includes the modeled starter probability, not merely the best name in the room.
Quarterback66
Offensive line51
Receivers69
Defensive front52
Secondary91
InChaz ColemanEDGE · from Penn State · 5★
InXavier GilliamDL · from Penn State · 4★
InKayin LeeCB · from Auburn · 3★
InDejuan LaneS · from Penn State · 3★
InAmare CampbellLB · from Penn State · 3★
InTJ MetcalfS · from Michigan · 3★
InDonovan HaslamIOL · from West Virginia · 3★
InOry WilliamsOT · from LSU · 3★
InIsaiah HardgeCB · from Colorado · 3★
InJavin GordonRB · from Tulane · 3★
InQua MossS · from Kansas State · 3★
InJadais RichardCB · from Miami · 3★
4M player valueHighest-leverage rolesMaximum point value assumes the player is fully unavailable and is reduced by status probability.
QBRyan Staub5.0 pts94% starter · usage + PPA + WEPA + portal role + QB starter probability
WRBraylon Staley0.9 pts62% expected role · usage + PPA + roster continuity
WRMike Matthews0.8 pts57% expected role · usage + PPA + roster continuity
RBDeSean Bishop0.8 pts79% expected role · usage + PPA + WEPA + roster continuity
TEEthan Davis0.8 pts54% expected role · usage + PPA + roster continuity
TEDaSaahn Brame0.7 pts54% expected role · usage + PPA + roster continuity
PlayerPos.4M valueSizeContinuity
#8Ryan StaubStevenson Ranch, CAQB5.0 pts94% starter · 76% conf.6′1″ · 204 lbTransfer infrom Colorado
#44Drake MartinezHouston, TXTE0.6 pts44% role · 64% conf.6′3″ · 245 lbTransfer infrom UT Martin
#29Isaiah HardgeHollywood, FLDB0.6 pts43% role · 64% conf.5′10″ · 182 lbTransfer infrom Colorado
#82Trent ThomasMobile, ALTE0.5 pts42% role · 64% conf.6′5″ · 252 lbTransfer infrom South Alabama
#69Donovan HaslamPerry, GAOL0.5 pts38% role · 40% conf.6′3″ · 350 lbTransfer infrom West Virginia
#77Ory WilliamsSan Marcos, TXOL0.5 pts38% role · 40% conf.6′8″ · 330 lbTransfer infrom LSU
#6Javin GordonToccoa, GARB0.5 pts62% role · 76% conf.5′10″ · 212 lbTransfer infrom Tulane
#33Jordan NormanHoover, ALDL0.5 pts38% role · 40% conf.6′4″ · 265 lbTransfer infrom Tulane
#2Xavier GilliamMontgomery Village, MDDL0.5 pts38% role · 40% conf.6′2″ · 305 lbTransfer infrom Penn State
#81Ian DuarteSanta Clarita, CAWR0.4 pts38% role · 40% conf.5′10″ · 181 lbTransfer infrom Idaho State
#10Dejuan LaneJessup, MDDB0.4 pts38% role · 40% conf.6′2″ · 215 lbTransfer infrom Penn State
#42DJ BurksMaryville, TNDB0.4 pts38% role · 40% conf.6′0″ · 196 lbTransfer infrom App State
#8Jadais RichardWest Monroe, LADB0.4 pts38% role · 40% conf.6′1″ · 202 lbTransfer infrom Miami
#14Kayin LeeEllenwood, GADB0.4 pts38% role · 40% conf.5′11″ · 190 lbTransfer infrom Auburn
#6Qua MossWest Point, GADB0.4 pts38% role · 40% conf.5′10″ · 188 lbTransfer infrom Kansas State
#20Tevis MetcalfBirmingham, ALDB0.4 pts38% role · 40% conf.5′10″ · 202 lbTransfer infrom Michigan
#1TJ MetcalfBirmingham, ALDB0.4 pts38% role · 40% conf.6′1″ · 205 lbTransfer infrom Michigan
#0Amare CampbellManassas, VALB0.4 pts38% role · 40% conf.6′0″ · 230 lbTransfer infrom Penn State
#28Cooper RanvierLexington, KYPK0.3 pts38% role · 52% conf.6′2″ · 199 lbTransfer infrom Louisville
#53Blake HowardCincinnati, OHLS0.3 pts38% role · 40% conf.6′2″ · 222 lbTransfer infrom Eastern Kentucky
#14Braylon StaleyAiken, SCWR0.9 pts62% role · 64% conf.6′0″ · 190 lbReturning
#4Mike MatthewsLilburn, GAWR0.8 pts57% role · 64% conf.6′1″ · 198 lbReturning
#18DeSean BishopKnoxville, TNRB0.8 pts79% role · 76% conf.5′10″ · 215 lbReturning
#0Ethan DavisAtlanta, GATE0.8 pts54% role · 64% conf.6′5″ · 247 lbReturning
#7DaSaahn BrameDerby, KSTE0.7 pts54% role · 64% conf.6′5″ · 240 lbReturning
#1Travis Smith Jr.Atlanta, GAWR0.7 pts47% role · 64% conf.6′3″ · 215 lbReturning
#3Radarious JacksonMemphis, TNWR0.7 pts47% role · 64% conf.6′2″ · 208 lbReturning
#55Antoni OgumoroSaipanOL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′4″ · 320 lbReturning
#59Charlie Powell IIICincinnati, OHOL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′3″ · 314 lbReturning
#70David Sanders Jr.Charlotte, NCOL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′6″ · 310 lbReturning
#78Gage GintherFort Collins, COOL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′5″ · 310 lbReturning
#51Jeremias HeardRome, GAOL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′8″ · 335 lbReturning
#72Jesse PerryMurfreesboro, TNOL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′6″ · 320 lbReturning
#58Nic MooreTalbott, TNOL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′3″ · 313 lbReturning
#56Sam PendletonLawsonville, NCOL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′4″ · 315 lbReturning
#74Shamurad UmarovAlpharetta, GAOL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′7″ · 321 lbReturning
#75Wendell Moe Jr.Long Beach, CAOL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′2″ · 330 lbReturning
#35Carson GentleChattanooga, TNDL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′3″ · 265 lbReturning
#99Charles House IIICharlotte, NCDL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′3″ · 290 lbReturning
#44Christian GassCovington, GADL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′3″ · 245 lbReturning
#5Daevin HobbsConcord, NCDL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′4″ · 290 lbReturning
#17Ethan UtleyNashville, TNDL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′4″ · 287 lbReturning
#47Isaiah CampbellDurham, NCDL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′4″ · 295 lbReturning
#96Isaiah IngeFresno, CADL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′1″ · 280 lbReturning
#9Mariyon DyeElkhart, INDL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′5″ · 270 lbReturning
#55Mike Bethea IIMaryville, TNDL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′1″ · 221 lbReturning
#19Nathan RobinsonGreenbrier, TNDL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′7″ · 295 lbReturning
#18Tyree WeathersbyDouglasville, GADL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′5″ · 268 lbReturning
#35Ben PetermannChicago, ILWR0.5 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′3″ · 208 lbReturning
#88Deon HardinBiloxi, MSWR0.5 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′0″ · 189 lbReturning
#29Jack-Henry JakobikBrentwood, TNWR0.5 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′4″ · 198 lbReturning
#9Joakim DodsonMemphis, TNWR0.5 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′0″ · 197 lbReturning
#36Nathan RobertsMorristown, TNWR0.5 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′4″ · 209 lbReturning
#80Cole HarrisonSan Mateo, CATE0.5 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′5″ · 239 lbReturning
#24Dylan LewisAtlanta, GADB0.5 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′0″ · 197 lbReturning
#15Edrees FarooqColumbia, MDDB0.5 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′0″ · 202 lbReturning
#43Jackson MathewsFranklin, TNDB0.5 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′0″ · 196 lbReturning
#23Sidney WaltonMoody, ALDB0.5 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′1″ · 197 lbReturning
#25Tim MerrittBirmingham, ALDB0.5 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′1″ · 194 lbReturning
#3Tre Poteat IIIFitchburg, WIDB0.5 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′0″ · 192 lbReturning
#4Ty RedmondAlpharetta, GADB0.5 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′3″ · 200 lbReturning
#17Daune MorrisChattanooga, TNRB0.5 pts57% role · 64% conf.5′10″ · 200 lbReturning
#7Arion CarterSmyrna, TNLB0.4 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′1″ · 238 lbReturning
#13Edwin SpillmanNashville, TNLB0.4 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′1″ · 225 lbReturning
#57Grier ShortFranklin, TNLB0.4 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′1″ · 222 lbReturning
#27Jadon PerlotteBuford, GALB0.4 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′4″ · 214 lbReturning
#12Jaedon HarmonRome, GALB0.4 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′0″ · 225 lbReturning
#22Jeremiah TelanderGainesville, GALB0.4 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′2″ · 235 lbReturning
#11Jordan BurnsConyers, GALB0.4 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′1″ · 227 lbReturning
#50Ryan ScottKnoxville, TNLB0.4 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′1″ · 220 lbReturning
#24Hunter BarnesMemphis, TNRB0.4 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′0″ · 200 lbReturning
#2Justin BakerStone Mountain, GARB0.4 pts44% role · 40% conf.5′10″ · 210 lbReturning
#93Grady DangerfieldCharleston, SCPK0.3 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′0″ · 215 lbReturning
#94Josh TurbyvilleKnoxville, TNPK0.3 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′2″ · 195 lbReturning
#98Jackson RossMelbourne, VICP0.3 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′4″ · 203 lbReturning
#48Bennett BradyMemphis, TNLS0.3 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′1″ · 210 lbReturning
#12George MacIntyreFranklin, TNQB0.2 pts4% starter · 40% conf.6′6″ · 208 lbReturning
#13Mason PhillipsKodak, TNQB0.2 pts4% starter · 40% conf.6′1″ · 188 lbReturning
#71Ed BakerBaltimore, MDOL0.3 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′4″ · 322 lbNew / unverified
#79Gabriel OsendaAirdrie, ABOL0.3 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′8″ · 330 lbNew / unverified
#63Jeremy George-ElKnoxville, TNOL0.3 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′4″ · 310 lbNew / unverified
#66Kamari BlairClarksville, TNOL0.3 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′6″ · 290 lbNew / unverified
#65Michael KostantonovNorthbrook, ILOL0.3 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′4″ · 322 lbNew / unverified
#60Thomas StormBrighton, MIOL0.3 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′4″ · 281 lbNew / unverified
#95Breeze CarterDouglasville, GADL0.3 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′3″ · 255 lbNew / unverified
#36Carter GoodenMarion, MADL0.3 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′4″ · 267 lbNew / unverified
#85CJ EdwardsEdison, NJDL0.3 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′3″ · 230 lbNew / unverified
#39Darryl RiversPowder Springs, GADL0.3 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′5″ · 287 lbNew / unverified
#59Dereon AlbertJackson, MSDL0.3 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′1″ · 309 lbNew / unverified
#97Hezekiah HarrisHuntsville, ALDL0.3 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′6″ · 248 lbNew / unverified
#26JJ FinchIndianapolis, INDL0.3 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′3″ · 293 lbNew / unverified
#37Kedric Golston IILeesburg, VADL0.3 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′3″ · 243 lbNew / unverified
#87Nuk SimmonsColumbus, GADL0.3 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′3″ · 300 lbNew / unverified
#38Brayden CarrollCleveland, TNWR0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′1″ · 188 lbNew / unverified
#26Doren SachaDenver, COWR0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′1″ · 180 lbNew / unverified
#30Jacolby CooperAlcoa, TNWR0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′0″ · 170 lbNew / unverified
#31Lane CopeMaryville, TNWR0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.5′9″ · 180 lbNew / unverified
#85Luke ThompsonFranklin, TNWR0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′1″ · 193 lbNew / unverified
#5TK KeysHattiesburg, MSWR0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′2″ · 198 lbNew / unverified
#19Tyreek KingKnoxville, TNWR0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.5′11″ · 175 lbNew / unverified
#87Luca WolfViennaTE0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′5″ · 255 lbNew / unverified
#21Jamyan TheodoreCleveland, OHDB0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′0″ · 173 lbNew / unverified
#30Javonte SmithJackson, TNDB0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′0″ · 183 lbNew / unverified
#31Joel WyattShelbyville, TNDB0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′4″ · 210 lbNew / unverified
#38Jowell CombayKennesaw, GADB0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′1″ · 200 lbNew / unverified
#40KJ McClainRahway, NJDB0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′0″ · 188 lbNew / unverified
#34Zay AndersonGreeneville, TNDB0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′0″ · 175 lbNew / unverified
#28Brayden RouseWoodstock, GALB0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′3″ · 225 lbNew / unverified
#51TJ WhiteJackson, MSLB0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′2″ · 237 lbNew / unverified
#11Faizon BrandonGreensboro, NCQB0.2 pts4% starter · 28% conf.6′4″ · 225 lbNew / unverified
#34Will RajeckiCanton, GARB0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.5′11″ · 208 lbNew / unverified
#99Logan FoleyMelbourne, VICP0.1 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′6″ · 234 lbNew / unverified

2026 schedule

The path that shapes the projection.

The model prices every scheduled game individually. Home field, neutral sites, completed results and opponent rating feed the expected-win total shown above.

Range of outcomes

The projection is the middle—not the ceiling.

Floor case4 wins

Instability at premium positions turns swing games into losses.

4M midpoint7 wins

The roster performs close to its current power and schedule baseline.

Ceiling case9 wins

Quarterback play and line continuity outperform the preseason prior.

The betting lens

Price and matchup decide the play.

No team is an automatic bet or fade. The goal is to identify when the market's story about Tennessee diverges from the football conditions required to cover.

Back them when

The matchup preserves the talent edge, the opponent cannot create pressure with four, and the price has not already charged a contender tax.

Pass or fade when

A difficult opponent is paired with short rest, uncertain quarterback availability or a line that assumes best-case continuity.

Watch first

Early-down success rate, pressure allowed and defensive explosive-play rate. Two stable categories would justify an upgrade.

Season-defining questionCan the roster hold its efficiency when the schedule produces SEC-level stress almost every week?