← Current week Game Center
AwayMichiganNo. 18 · +13.4
4M projection
Away21–Home32
Home -11.574% win
HomeOregonNo. 2 · +24.3
Week 11Saturday, November 14 at 12:00 AM ESTNetwork TBAAutzen Stadium7-day forecast pending
DraftKings marketOregon -13.5 · O/U 53.5Details
Live sportsbookDraftKingsUpdated Sep 5, 3:03 PM ET
SpreadOregon -13.5 -108Michigan +13.5 -112
TotalOver 53.5 -112Under 53.5 -108
MoneylineOregon -600Michigan +440
OpeningOregon -13.5O/U 53.5 · No spread move
Pass
Pass at the current number.

4M projects Oregon 32 · Michigan 21 while DraftKings lists Oregon -13.5. That creates 2.0 points of difference toward Michigan.

See the betting translation ↓
10-second readLatest updateNo material market, weather or availability alert in the current snapshot. · Sep 5, 3:03 PM ET
Projected result
Oregon 32–21

Oregon has a 74% win chance in a clear edge matchup.

Key matchup
Oregon · Defensive matchup

Opponent-adjusted prevention and disruption is the clearest advantage supporting the projection.

Biggest concernTurnovers and explosive plays can flip it.

Michigan needs short fields or a possession advantage to break the expected script.

Game shapeClear edge
Expected styleAverage pace · Average-scoring
Projected pace12.0 possessions per team
Forecast snapshotOregon leads the modelClear edge · Average pace
4M fair lineOregon -11.5
Projected total52.5
Oregon win74%
Projection confidence85%
Michigan26% win
Oregon74% win

How the game projects

Oregon owns the median outcome. Michigan needs the game to bend.

Why Oregon winsTurn the defensive matchup edge into repeatable downs.

Opponent-adjusted prevention and disruption. Protect the football and make that advantage show up across full drives instead of isolated plays.

How Michigan winsCreate a shorter, higher-variance game.

Generate short fields, win explosive plays and force the favorite to finish difficult drives.

Read the full projection +

The model makes Oregon the neutral-field leader after blending opponent-adjusted efficiency, predictive ratings, roster quality, returning production, portal impact and special teams. The complete environment contributes +3.0 points toward the home-team margin. The median score is Oregon 32 · Michigan 21, with roughly 12.0 possessions per team.

This is a distribution, not a promise. Oregon wins 74% of the outcome curve; the remaining probability captures turnovers, finishing-drive variance, injuries and early-season uncertainty.

Watch earlyThe opening signals that matter most
01Oregon · Defensive matchup

Does the strongest model advantage appear on the opening possessions?

02Average pace

12.0 possessions per team is the scoring baseline.

03Michigan · hidden possessions

Turnovers, short fields and explosive plays are the clearest upset path.

Why the model likes it

The matchup engine, from highlights to detail.

01 · Defensive matchup
Oregon
+16.2 indexOpponent-adjusted prevention and disruption
02 · Offensive matchup
Oregon
+13.8 indexExpected efficiency and scoring leverage
03 · Quarterback
Oregon
+8.8 indexStarter probability, production and continuity
Explore the matchup

Open only the part you want. Every figure is a matchup index—not a projected point adjustment.

Offense vs. defenseEfficiency, explosives and coverageOregon leads
Offensive efficiencyOregon

Expected scoring efficiency and early-down leverage across the two offenses.

+13.8 indexMedium confidence
MO
Defensive resistanceOregon

Opponent-adjusted prevention, disruption and finishing-drive defense.

+16.2 indexMedium confidence
MO
ReceiversOregon

Pass-game production, returning usage and depth against the opposing coverage unit.

+12.6 indexMedium confidence
MO
SecondaryOregon

Coverage experience and play prevention against the opposing passing attack.

0.0 indexMedium confidence
MO
Quarterback & personnelThe players most capable of moving the numberOregon leads
QuarterbackOregon

Starter probability, proven production, continuity and transfer translation.

+8.8 indexMedium confidence
MO
Player valueOregon

Role-weighted returning production and incoming transfer contribution.

+3.8 indexMedium confidence
MO
Roster qualityOregon

Recruiting baseline, usable depth and talent concentration at premium positions.

+5.1 indexMedium confidence
MO
Line of scrimmageProtection, disruption and field positionOregon leads
Offensive lineOregon

Returning line usage, protection stability and the ability to avoid negative plays.

0.0 indexMedium confidence
MO
Defensive frontMichigan

Pressure, havoc and run disruption without needing extra defenders.

+5.0 indexMedium confidence
MO
Special teamsOregon

Kicking, field position and hidden-yardage efficiency.

+25.2 indexMedium confidence
MO
EnvironmentHome field, travel, weather and availabilityOregon leads
Home environmentOregon

Oregon's learned home baseline, venue history, capacity and altitude at Autzen Stadium.

+2.1 indexMedium confidence
MO
Travel & body clockOregon

Relative trip distance, time-zone change and local kickoff timing.

+0.9 indexMedium confidence
MO
RestOregon

Difference in recovery time entering the game.

0.0 indexMedium confidence
MO
AvailabilityOregon

Verified injury and availability reports applied as a live overlay.

0.0 indexMedium confidence
MO
How 4M built the fair lineOregon -11.5View the number bridge +
Neutral marginOregon +8.4Team strength before location
Base home field+2.0National home baseline
Venue + altitude+0.1Learned history, capacity and elevation
Travel + body clock+0.9Relative trip and kickoff timing
Rest0.0Days-between-games difference
Live availability0.0Verified personnel overlay

The location calculation combines the learned national baseline with venue and conference history, capacity, altitude, travel, body clock and rest. The archived team ratings remain neutral-field numbers.

Personnel file

Continuity, transfers and the people who can move the number.

MichiganKyle Whittingham · new staff
69 returners17 additions32 departures
Top modeled impact
  1. Bryce UnderwoodQB · Returning3.1
  2. Brayden Fowler-NicolosiQB · Transfer in from Colorado State2.1
  3. Andrew MarshWR · Returning0.8
Full team dossier →
OregonDan Lanning
59 returners13 additions31 departures
Top modeled impact
  1. Dante MooreQB · Returning3.9
  2. Dylan RaiolaQB · Transfer in from Nebraska1.5
  3. Iverson HooksWR · Transfer in from UAB0.8
Full team dossier →

Market translation

No automatic play.

PassPass at the current number.

The current price does not clear the model's required advantage.

Current price · DraftKingsOregon -13.5O/U 53.5
4M fair lineOregon -11.5Projected total 52.5
Current difference2.0 ptsMichigan side
Bet thresholdMichigan +16.5 or better5.0-point side requirement
Primary riskVariance beats the baselineTurnovers, explosive plays and late availability
Model vs. market detailsSee the calculation, audits and pregame line movement+
Independent line comparison2.0-point difference
Market-13.54M-11.5
Oregon sideMichigan side

The 4M line remains independent. A difference becomes actionable only when it clears the required edge and the availability, weather and disagreement audits.

What needs to happen: the projected unit advantages must survive first down and the turnover margin must stay near even. After kickoff, both the model and market comparison stay frozen.

Schedule context

What comes immediately before and after this matchup.

MichiganFive-game timeline
  1. W9Oct 31at RutgersAway
  2. W10Nov 7vs Michigan StateHome
  3. NOWNov 14at OregonCurrent matchup
  4. W12Nov 21vs UCLAHome
  5. W13Nov 28at Ohio StateAway
View full Michigan schedule →
OregonFive-game timeline
  1. W9Oct 31vs NorthwesternHome
  2. W10Nov 7at Ohio StateAway
  3. NOWNov 14vs MichiganCurrent matchup
  4. W12Nov 20at Michigan StateAway
  5. W13Nov 28vs WashingtonHome
View full Oregon schedule →