← Current week Game Center
AwayPurdueNo. 78 · -2.4
4M projection
Away16–Home37
Home -20.687% win
HomeIndianaNo. 4 · +22.7
Week 13Saturday, November 28 at 12:00 AM ESTNetwork TBAMemorial Stadium (Bloomington, IN)7-day forecast pending
Sportsbook marketMarket not postedThe 4M football projection remains independent.
Pass
Pass at the current number.

4M projects Indiana 37 · Purdue 16. No sportsbook line is posted yet, so model value and the betting threshold remain pending.

See the betting translation ↓
10-second readLatest updateNo material market, weather or availability alert in the current snapshot. · Aug 27, 11:30 AM ET
Projected result
Indiana 37–16

Indiana has a 87% win chance in a mismatch matchup.

Key matchup
Indiana · Defensive matchup

Opponent-adjusted prevention and disruption is the clearest advantage supporting the projection.

Biggest concernTurnovers and explosive plays can flip it.

Purdue needs short fields or a possession advantage to break the expected script.

Game shapeMismatch
Expected styleAverage pace · Average-scoring
Projected pace12.0 possessions per team
Forecast snapshotIndiana leads the modelMismatch · Average pace
4M fair lineIndiana -20.6
Projected total52.4
Indiana win87%
Projection confidence85%
Purdue13% win
Indiana87% win

How the game projects

Indiana owns the median outcome. Purdue needs the game to bend.

Why Indiana winsTurn the defensive matchup edge into repeatable downs.

Opponent-adjusted prevention and disruption. Protect the football and make that advantage show up across full drives instead of isolated plays.

How Purdue winsCreate a shorter, higher-variance game.

Generate short fields, win explosive plays and force the favorite to finish difficult drives.

Read the full projection +

The model makes Indiana the neutral-field leader after blending opponent-adjusted efficiency, predictive ratings, roster quality, returning production, portal impact and special teams. The complete environment contributes +2.1 points toward the home-team margin. The median score is Indiana 37 · Purdue 16, with roughly 12.0 possessions per team.

This is a distribution, not a promise. Indiana wins 87% of the outcome curve; the remaining probability captures turnovers, finishing-drive variance, injuries and early-season uncertainty.

Watch earlyThe opening signals that matter most
01Indiana · Defensive matchup

Does the strongest model advantage appear on the opening possessions?

02Average pace

12.0 possessions per team is the scoring baseline.

03Purdue · hidden possessions

Turnovers, short fields and explosive plays are the clearest upset path.

Why the model likes it

The matchup engine, from highlights to detail.

01 · Defensive matchup
Indiana
+33.3 indexOpponent-adjusted prevention and disruption
02 · Offensive matchup
Indiana
+31.6 indexExpected efficiency and scoring leverage
03 · Quarterback
Indiana
+3.9 indexStarter probability, production and continuity
Explore the matchup

Open only the part you want. Every figure is a matchup index—not a projected point adjustment.

Offense vs. defenseEfficiency, explosives and coverageIndiana leads
Offensive efficiencyIndiana

Expected scoring efficiency and early-down leverage across the two offenses.

+31.6 indexMedium confidence
PI
Defensive resistanceIndiana

Opponent-adjusted prevention, disruption and finishing-drive defense.

+33.3 indexMedium confidence
PI
ReceiversPurdue

Pass-game production, returning usage and depth against the opposing coverage unit.

+11.2 indexMedium confidence
PI
SecondaryIndiana

Coverage experience and play prevention against the opposing passing attack.

0.0 indexMedium confidence
PI
Quarterback & personnelThe players most capable of moving the numberIndiana leads
QuarterbackIndiana

Starter probability, proven production, continuity and transfer translation.

+3.9 indexMedium confidence
PI
Player valueIndiana

Role-weighted returning production and incoming transfer contribution.

+2.5 indexMedium confidence
PI
Roster qualityPurdue

Recruiting baseline, usable depth and talent concentration at premium positions.

+1.5 indexMedium confidence
PI
Line of scrimmageProtection, disruption and field positionPurdue leads
Offensive lineIndiana

Returning line usage, protection stability and the ability to avoid negative plays.

0.0 indexMedium confidence
PI
Defensive frontIndiana

Pressure, havoc and run disruption without needing extra defenders.

0.0 indexMedium confidence
PI
Special teamsPurdue

Kicking, field position and hidden-yardage efficiency.

+4.9 indexMedium confidence
PI
EnvironmentHome field, travel, weather and availabilityIndiana leads
Home environmentIndiana

Indiana's learned home baseline, venue history, capacity and altitude at Memorial Stadium (Bloomington, IN).

+2.1 indexMedium confidence
PI
Travel & body clockIndiana

Relative trip distance, time-zone change and local kickoff timing.

+0.0 indexMedium confidence
PI
RestIndiana

Difference in recovery time entering the game.

0.0 indexMedium confidence
PI
AvailabilityIndiana

Verified injury and availability reports applied as a live overlay.

0.0 indexMedium confidence
PI
How 4M built the fair lineIndiana -20.6View the number bridge +
Neutral marginIndiana +18.5Team strength before location
Base home field+2.0National home baseline
Venue + altitude+0.1Learned history, capacity and elevation
Travel + body clock+0.0Relative trip and kickoff timing
Rest0.0Days-between-games difference
Live availability0.0Verified personnel overlay

The location calculation combines the learned national baseline with venue and conference history, capacity, altitude, travel, body clock and rest. The archived team ratings remain neutral-field numbers.

Personnel file

Continuity, transfers and the people who can move the number.

PurdueBarry Odom
65 returners29 additions24 departures
Top modeled impact
  1. Ryan BrowneQB · Returning4.9
  2. Bisi OwensWR · Transfer in from Pennsylvania0.9
  3. Asaad WaseemWR · Transfer in from Florida Atlantic0.8
Full team dossier →
IndianaCurt Cignetti
60 returners17 additions16 departures
Top modeled impact
  1. Josh HooverQB · Transfer in from TCU5.2
  2. Nick MarshWR · Transfer in from Michigan State0.8
  3. Charlie BeckerWR · Returning0.8
Full team dossier →

Market translation

No automatic play.

No licensed pregame market is attached. The 4M football forecast remains archived, but no live-game price is substituted after kickoff.

Schedule context

What comes immediately before and after this matchup.