← Current week Game Center
AwayColorado StateNo. 115 · -10.7
4M projection
Away21–Home32
Home -11.574% win
HomeUTSANo. 60 · +1.3
Week 4Saturday, September 26 at 12:00 AM EDTNetwork TBAAlamodomeIndoor
Locked pregame marketUTSA -13.5 · O/U 57.5Details
Pregame sportsbookFanDuelLocked Aug 27, 11:29 AM ET
SpreadUTSA -13.5 -105Colorado State +13.5 -115
TotalOver 57.5 -110Under 57.5 -110
MoneylineUTSA -550Colorado State +390
OpeningUTSA -13.5O/U 56.5 · No spread move
Model lean
Under 57.5 is the current model lean.

4M projects UTSA 32 · Colorado State 21 while FanDuel lists UTSA -13.5. That creates 2.0 points of difference toward Colorado State.

See the betting translation ↓
Final · permanent model receiptColorado State 45 · UTSA 59
Winner hitStraight-up projection2.5 ptsProjected-margin error51.1 ptsProjected-total errorATS side lostFrozen market comparison
See the complete 4M record →
10-second readLatest updateThe model and sportsbook snapshot are permanently locked at kickoff. · Aug 27, 11:29 AM ET
Projected result
UTSA 32–21

UTSA has a 74% win chance in a clear edge matchup.

Key matchup
UTSA · Defensive matchup

Opponent-adjusted prevention and disruption is the clearest advantage supporting the projection.

Biggest concernTurnovers and explosive plays can flip it.

Colorado State needs short fields or a possession advantage to break the expected script.

Game shapeClear edge
Expected styleAverage pace · Average-scoring
Projected pace12.0 possessions per team
Forecast snapshotUTSA leads the modelClear edge · Average pace
4M fair lineUTSA -11.5
Projected total52.9
UTSA win74%
Projection confidence85%
Colorado State26% win
UTSA74% win

How the game projects

UTSA owns the median outcome. Colorado State needs the game to bend.

Why UTSA winsTurn the defensive matchup edge into repeatable downs.

Opponent-adjusted prevention and disruption. Protect the football and make that advantage show up across full drives instead of isolated plays.

How Colorado State winsCreate a shorter, higher-variance game.

Generate short fields, win explosive plays and force the favorite to finish difficult drives.

Read the full projection +

The model makes UTSA the neutral-field leader after blending opponent-adjusted efficiency, predictive ratings, roster quality, returning production, portal impact and special teams. The complete environment contributes +2.4 points toward the home-team margin. The median score is UTSA 32 · Colorado State 21, with roughly 12.0 possessions per team.

This is a distribution, not a promise. UTSA wins 74% of the outcome curve; the remaining probability captures turnovers, finishing-drive variance, injuries and early-season uncertainty.

Watch earlyThe opening signals that matter most
01UTSA · Defensive matchup

Does the strongest model advantage appear on the opening possessions?

02Average pace

12.0 possessions per team is the scoring baseline.

03Colorado State · hidden possessions

Turnovers, short fields and explosive plays are the clearest upset path.

Why the model likes it

The matchup engine, from highlights to detail.

01 · Defensive matchup
UTSA
+18.1 indexOpponent-adjusted prevention and disruption
02 · Offensive matchup
UTSA
+11.0 indexExpected efficiency and scoring leverage
03 · Player value
UTSA
+7.4 indexRole-weighted returning and transfer production
Explore the matchup

Open only the part you want. Every figure is a matchup index—not a projected point adjustment.

Offense vs. defenseEfficiency, explosives and coverageUTSA leads
Offensive efficiencyUTSA

Expected scoring efficiency and early-down leverage across the two offenses.

+11.0 indexMedium confidence
CSU
Defensive resistanceUTSA

Opponent-adjusted prevention, disruption and finishing-drive defense.

+18.1 indexMedium confidence
CSU
ReceiversUTSA

Pass-game production, returning usage and depth against the opposing coverage unit.

+6.6 indexMedium confidence
CSU
SecondaryUTSA

Coverage experience and play prevention against the opposing passing attack.

0.0 indexMedium confidence
CSU
Quarterback & personnelThe players most capable of moving the numberUTSA leads
QuarterbackUTSA

Starter probability, proven production, continuity and transfer translation.

+6.6 indexMedium confidence
CSU
Player valueUTSA

Role-weighted returning production and incoming transfer contribution.

+7.4 indexMedium confidence
CSU
Roster qualityUTSA

Recruiting baseline, usable depth and talent concentration at premium positions.

+2.6 indexMedium confidence
CSU
Line of scrimmageProtection, disruption and field positionUTSA leads
Offensive lineUTSA

Returning line usage, protection stability and the ability to avoid negative plays.

0.0 indexMedium confidence
CSU
Defensive frontUTSA

Pressure, havoc and run disruption without needing extra defenders.

0.0 indexMedium confidence
CSU
Special teamsUTSA

Kicking, field position and hidden-yardage efficiency.

+27.8 indexMedium confidence
CSU
EnvironmentHome field, travel, weather and availabilityUTSA leads
Home environmentUTSA

UTSA's learned home baseline, venue history, capacity and altitude at Alamodome.

+1.9 indexMedium confidence
CSU
Travel & body clockUTSA

Relative trip distance, time-zone change and local kickoff timing.

+0.5 indexMedium confidence
CSU
RestUTSA

Difference in recovery time entering the game.

0.0 indexMedium confidence
CSU
AvailabilityUTSA

Verified injury and availability reports applied as a live overlay.

0.0 indexMedium confidence
CSU
How 4M built the fair lineUTSA -11.5View the number bridge +
Neutral marginUTSA +9.1Team strength before location
Base home field+2.0National home baseline
Venue + altitude-0.1Learned history, capacity and elevation
Travel + body clock+0.5Relative trip and kickoff timing
Rest0.0Days-between-games difference
Live availability0.0Verified personnel overlay

The location calculation combines the learned national baseline with venue and conference history, capacity, altitude, travel, body clock and rest. The archived team ratings remain neutral-field numbers.

Personnel file

Continuity, transfers and the people who can move the number.

Colorado StateJim Mora · new staff
80 returners32 additions38 departures
Top modeled impact
  1. Darius CurryQB · Returning4.4
  2. Lavon BrownWR · Returning0.7
  3. Tay LanierWR · Returning0.7
Full team dossier →
UTSAJeff Traylor
63 returners22 additions23 departures
Top modeled impact
  1. Owen McCownQB · Returning5.0
  2. AJ Wilson Jr.WR · Returning0.8
  3. David Amador IIWR · Returning0.8
Full team dossier →

Pregame market receipt

Under 57.5.

Model leanUnder 57.5 is the current model lean.

This comparison is frozen and will not move with live-game odds.

Locked price · FanDuelUTSA -13.5O/U 57.5
4M fair lineUTSA -11.5Projected total 52.9
Pregame difference2.0 ptsColorado State side
Bet thresholdUnder 55.9 or higher5.0-point side requirement
Primary riskVariance beats the baselineTurnovers, explosive plays and late availability
Model vs. market detailsSee the calculation, audits and pregame line movement+
Independent line comparison2.0-point difference
Market-13.54M-11.5
UTSA sideColorado State side

The 4M line remains independent. A difference becomes actionable only when it clears the required edge and the availability, weather and disagreement audits.

What needs to happen: the projected unit advantages must survive first down and the turnover margin must stay near even. After kickoff, both the model and market comparison stay frozen.

FanDuel pregame movement3 stored snapshots
  1. -13.5O/U 56.5
  2. -13.5O/U 57.5
  3. -13.5O/U 57.5

Schedule context

What comes immediately before and after this matchup.

Colorado StateFive-game timeline
  1. W2Sep 12vs Southern UtahHome
  2. W3Sep 19vs BYUHome
  3. NOWSep 26at UTSACurrent matchup
  4. W5Oct 3vs Oregon StateHome
  5. W7Oct 15at Texas StateAway
View full Colorado State schedule →
UTSAFive-game timeline
  1. W2Sep 12at Texas StateAway
  2. W3Sep 19at TexasAway
  3. NOWSep 26vs Colorado StateCurrent matchup
  4. W5Oct 3at RiceAway
  5. W6Oct 8vs South FloridaHome
View full UTSA schedule →