← Current week Game Center
AwayUL MonroeNo. 133 · -16.5
4M projection
Away23–Home29
Home -5.562% win
HomeUABNo. 120 · -11.7
Week 2Saturday, September 12 at 3:30 PM EDTESPN+Protective Stadium85.5° · 6.9 mph
Locked pregame marketUAB -8.5 · O/U 54.5Details
Pregame sportsbookFanDuelLocked Aug 27, 11:29 AM ET
SpreadUAB -8.5 -110UL Monroe +8.5 -110
TotalOver 54.5 -105Under 54.5 -115
MoneylineUAB -360UL Monroe +280
OpeningUAB -9.5O/U 52.5 · Spread moved +1.0
Pass
Pass at the current number.

4M projects UAB 29 · UL Monroe 23 while FanDuel lists UAB -8.5. That creates 3.0 points of difference toward UL Monroe.

See the betting translation ↓
Final · permanent model receiptUL Monroe 20 · UAB 26
Winner hitStraight-up projection0.5 ptsProjected-margin error6.1 ptsProjected-total errorATS side wonFrozen market comparison
See the complete 4M record →
10-second readLatest updateThe model and sportsbook snapshot are permanently locked at kickoff. · Aug 27, 11:29 AM ET
Projected result
UAB 29–23

UAB has a 62% win chance in a competitive matchup.

Key matchup
UL Monroe · Defensive matchup

UL Monroe leads this category, but UAB still leads the complete model.

Biggest concernTurnovers and explosive plays can flip it.

UL Monroe needs short fields or a possession advantage to break the expected script.

Game shapeCompetitive
Expected styleAverage pace · Average-scoring
Projected pace12.0 possessions per team
Forecast snapshotUAB leads the modelCompetitive · Average pace
4M fair lineUAB -5.5
Projected total52.1
UAB win62%
Projection confidence89%
UL Monroe38% win
UAB62% win

How the game projects

UAB owns the median outcome. UL Monroe needs the game to bend.

Why UAB winsTurn the roster quality edge into repeatable downs.

Talent, depth and recruiting baseline. Protect the football and make that advantage show up across full drives instead of isolated plays.

How UL Monroe winsMake defensive matchup decide the game.

Opponent-adjusted prevention and disruption. Pair that advantage with short fields and explosive plays.

Read the full projection +

The model makes UAB the neutral-field leader after blending opponent-adjusted efficiency, predictive ratings, roster quality, returning production, portal impact and special teams. The complete environment contributes +2.4 points toward the home-team margin. The median score is UAB 29 · UL Monroe 23, with roughly 12.0 possessions per team.

This is a distribution, not a promise. UAB wins 62% of the outcome curve; the remaining probability captures turnovers, finishing-drive variance, injuries and early-season uncertainty.

Watch earlyThe opening signals that matter most
01UL Monroe · Defensive matchup

Does the strongest model advantage appear on the opening possessions?

02Average pace

12.0 possessions per team is the scoring baseline.

03UL Monroe · hidden possessions

Turnovers, short fields and explosive plays are the clearest upset path.

Why the model likes it

The matchup engine, from highlights to detail.

01 · Defensive matchup
UL Monroe
+10.6 indexOpponent-adjusted prevention and disruption
02 · Roster quality
UAB
+9.8 indexTalent, depth and recruiting baseline
03 · Home environment
UAB
+2.4 indexVenue, travel, body clock and rest
Explore the matchup

Open only the part you want. Every figure is a matchup index—not a projected point adjustment.

Offense vs. defenseEfficiency, explosives and coverageUL Monroe leads
Offensive efficiencyUAB

Expected scoring efficiency and early-down leverage across the two offenses.

+2.1 indexHigh confidence
UMU
Defensive resistanceUL Monroe

Opponent-adjusted prevention, disruption and finishing-drive defense.

+10.6 indexHigh confidence
UMU
ReceiversUL Monroe

Pass-game production, returning usage and depth against the opposing coverage unit.

+3.9 indexHigh confidence
UMU
SecondaryUL Monroe

Coverage experience and play prevention against the opposing passing attack.

+5.4 indexHigh confidence
UMU
Quarterback & personnelThe players most capable of moving the numberUAB leads
QuarterbackUL Monroe

Starter probability, proven production, continuity and transfer translation.

+1.3 indexHigh confidence
UMU
Player valueUAB

Role-weighted returning production and incoming transfer contribution.

+1.5 indexHigh confidence
UMU
Roster qualityUAB

Recruiting baseline, usable depth and talent concentration at premium positions.

+9.8 indexHigh confidence
UMU
Line of scrimmageProtection, disruption and field positionUL Monroe leads
Offensive lineUAB

Returning line usage, protection stability and the ability to avoid negative plays.

0.0 indexHigh confidence
UMU
Defensive frontUAB

Pressure, havoc and run disruption without needing extra defenders.

0.0 indexHigh confidence
UMU
Special teamsUL Monroe

Kicking, field position and hidden-yardage efficiency.

+1.8 indexHigh confidence
UMU
EnvironmentHome field, travel, weather and availabilityUAB leads
Home environmentUAB

UAB's learned home baseline, venue history, capacity and altitude at Protective Stadium.

+2.0 indexHigh confidence
UMU
Travel & body clockUAB

Relative trip distance, time-zone change and local kickoff timing.

+0.1 indexHigh confidence
UMU
RestUAB

Difference in recovery time entering the game.

+0.2 indexHigh confidence
UMU
AvailabilityUAB

Verified injury and availability reports applied as a live overlay.

0.0 indexHigh confidence
UMU
How 4M built the fair lineUAB -5.5View the number bridge +
Neutral marginUAB +3.1Team strength before location
Base home field+2.0National home baseline
Venue + altitude+0.0Learned history, capacity and elevation
Travel + body clock+0.1Relative trip and kickoff timing
Rest+0.2Days-between-games difference
Live availability0.0Verified personnel overlay

The location calculation combines the learned national baseline with venue and conference history, capacity, altitude, travel, body clock and rest. The archived team ratings remain neutral-field numbers.

Personnel file

Continuity, transfers and the people who can move the number.

UL MonroeBryant Vincent
44 returners20 additions17 departures
Top modeled impact
  1. Aidan ArmentaQB · Returning4.6
  2. Nic TrujilloWR · Returning0.7
  3. Brandon BuckhaulterWR · Returning0.7
Full team dossier →
UABAlex Mortensen
45 returners38 additions33 departures
Top modeled impact
  1. Ryder BurtonQB · Returning4.5
  2. Kaleb BrownWR · Returning0.7
  3. Antonio FergusonTE · Returning0.7
Full team dossier →

Pregame market receipt

No automatic play.

PassPass at the current number.

This comparison is frozen and will not move with live-game odds.

Locked price · FanDuelUAB -8.5O/U 54.5
4M fair lineUAB -5.5Projected total 52.1
Pregame difference3.0 ptsUL Monroe side
Bet thresholdUL Monroe +10.5 or better5.0-point side requirement
Primary riskVariance beats the baselineTurnovers, explosive plays and late availability
Model vs. market detailsSee the calculation, audits and pregame line movement+
Independent line comparison3.0-point difference
Market-8.54M-5.5
UAB sideUL Monroe side

The 4M line remains independent. A difference becomes actionable only when it clears the required edge and the availability, weather and disagreement audits.

What needs to happen: the projected unit advantages must survive first down and the turnover margin must stay near even. After kickoff, both the model and market comparison stay frozen.

FanDuel pregame movement72 stored snapshots
  1. -9.5O/U 54.5
  2. -9.5O/U 54.5
  3. -9.5O/U 54.5
  4. -9.5O/U 54.5
  5. -9.5O/U 54.5
  6. -9.5O/U 54.5
  7. -8.5O/U 54.5
  8. -8.5O/U 54.5

Schedule context

What comes immediately before and after this matchup.

UL MonroeFive-game timeline
  1. W1Sep 5at Mississippi StateAway
  2. NOWSep 12at UABCurrent matchup
  3. W3Sep 19vs SE LouisianaHome
  4. W4Sep 26vs Florida AtlanticHome
  5. W5Oct 3at South AlabamaAway
View full UL Monroe schedule →
UABFive-game timeline
  1. W1Sep 3at IllinoisAway
  2. NOWSep 12vs UL MonroeCurrent matchup
  3. W3Sep 19at LouisianaAway
  4. W4Sep 25vs NavyHome
  5. W5Oct 3vs SamfordHome
View full UAB schedule →