← Current week Game Center
AwayUABNo. 120 · -11.7
4M projection
Away22–Home33
Home -11.173% win
HomeNorth TexasNo. 67 · +0.1
Week 13Saturday, November 28 at 12:00 AM ESTNetwork TBADATCU Stadium7-day forecast pending
Sportsbook marketMarket not postedThe 4M football projection remains independent.
Pass
Pass at the current number.

4M projects North Texas 33 · UAB 22. No sportsbook line is posted yet, so model value and the betting threshold remain pending.

See the betting translation ↓
10-second readLatest updateNo material market, weather or availability alert in the current snapshot. · Aug 27, 11:30 AM ET
Projected result
North Texas 33–22

North Texas has a 73% win chance in a clear edge matchup.

Key matchup
North Texas · Offensive matchup

Expected efficiency and scoring leverage is the clearest advantage supporting the projection.

Biggest concernTurnovers and explosive plays can flip it.

UAB needs short fields or a possession advantage to break the expected script.

Game shapeClear edge
Expected styleAverage pace · Average-scoring
Projected pace12.0 possessions per team
Forecast snapshotNorth Texas leads the modelClear edge · Average pace
4M fair lineNorth Texas -11.1
Projected total55.7
North Texas win73%
Projection confidence85%
UAB27% win
North Texas73% win

How the game projects

North Texas owns the median outcome. UAB needs the game to bend.

Why North Texas winsTurn the offensive matchup edge into repeatable downs.

Expected efficiency and scoring leverage. Protect the football and make that advantage show up across full drives instead of isolated plays.

How UAB winsMake quarterback decide the game.

Starter probability, production and continuity. Pair that advantage with short fields and explosive plays.

Read the full projection +

The model makes North Texas the neutral-field leader after blending opponent-adjusted efficiency, predictive ratings, roster quality, returning production, portal impact and special teams. The complete environment contributes +2.1 points toward the home-team margin. The median score is North Texas 33 · UAB 22, with roughly 12.0 possessions per team.

This is a distribution, not a promise. North Texas wins 73% of the outcome curve; the remaining probability captures turnovers, finishing-drive variance, injuries and early-season uncertainty.

Watch earlyThe opening signals that matter most
01North Texas · Offensive matchup

Does the strongest model advantage appear on the opening possessions?

02Average pace

12.0 possessions per team is the scoring baseline.

03UAB · hidden possessions

Turnovers, short fields and explosive plays are the clearest upset path.

Why the model likes it

The matchup engine, from highlights to detail.

01 · Offensive matchup
North Texas
+34.8 indexExpected efficiency and scoring leverage
02 · Quarterback
UAB
+14.6 indexStarter probability, production and continuity
03 · Defensive matchup
North Texas
+8.7 indexOpponent-adjusted prevention and disruption
Explore the matchup

Open only the part you want. Every figure is a matchup index—not a projected point adjustment.

Offense vs. defenseEfficiency, explosives and coverageNorth Texas leads
Offensive efficiencyNorth Texas

Expected scoring efficiency and early-down leverage across the two offenses.

+34.8 indexMedium confidence
UNT
Defensive resistanceNorth Texas

Opponent-adjusted prevention, disruption and finishing-drive defense.

+8.7 indexMedium confidence
UNT
ReceiversNorth Texas

Pass-game production, returning usage and depth against the opposing coverage unit.

+13.2 indexMedium confidence
UNT
SecondaryNorth Texas

Coverage experience and play prevention against the opposing passing attack.

+5.4 indexMedium confidence
UNT
Quarterback & personnelThe players most capable of moving the numberUAB leads
QuarterbackUAB

Starter probability, proven production, continuity and transfer translation.

+14.6 indexMedium confidence
UNT
Player valueUAB

Role-weighted returning production and incoming transfer contribution.

+6.2 indexMedium confidence
UNT
Roster qualityUAB

Recruiting baseline, usable depth and talent concentration at premium positions.

+6.7 indexMedium confidence
UNT
Line of scrimmageProtection, disruption and field positionNorth Texas leads
Offensive lineNorth Texas

Returning line usage, protection stability and the ability to avoid negative plays.

0.0 indexMedium confidence
UNT
Defensive frontNorth Texas

Pressure, havoc and run disruption without needing extra defenders.

0.0 indexMedium confidence
UNT
Special teamsNorth Texas

Kicking, field position and hidden-yardage efficiency.

+14.3 indexMedium confidence
UNT
EnvironmentHome field, travel, weather and availabilityNorth Texas leads
Home environmentNorth Texas

North Texas's learned home baseline, venue history, capacity and altitude at DATCU Stadium.

+1.8 indexMedium confidence
UNT
Travel & body clockNorth Texas

Relative trip distance, time-zone change and local kickoff timing.

+0.2 indexMedium confidence
UNT
RestNorth Texas

Difference in recovery time entering the game.

0.0 indexMedium confidence
UNT
AvailabilityNorth Texas

Verified injury and availability reports applied as a live overlay.

0.0 indexMedium confidence
UNT
How 4M built the fair lineNorth Texas -11.1View the number bridge +
Neutral marginNorth Texas +9.0Team strength before location
Base home field+2.0National home baseline
Venue + altitude-0.1Learned history, capacity and elevation
Travel + body clock+0.2Relative trip and kickoff timing
Rest0.0Days-between-games difference
Live availability0.0Verified personnel overlay

The location calculation combines the learned national baseline with venue and conference history, capacity, altitude, travel, body clock and rest. The archived team ratings remain neutral-field numbers.

Personnel file

Continuity, transfers and the people who can move the number.

UABAlex Mortensen
45 returners38 additions33 departures
Top modeled impact
  1. Ryder BurtonQB · Returning4.5
  2. Kaleb BrownWR · Returning0.7
  3. Antonio FergusonTE · Returning0.7
Full team dossier →
North TexasNeal Brown · new staff
36 returners49 additions38 departures
Top modeled impact
  1. Tayven JacksonQB · Transfer in from UCF3.2
  2. Chaston DittaQB · Transfer in from East Carolina1.6
  3. Corri MillinerWR · Transfer in from UAB0.8
Full team dossier →

Market translation

No automatic play.

No licensed pregame market is attached. The 4M football forecast remains archived, but no live-game price is substituted after kickoff.

Schedule context

What comes immediately before and after this matchup.