← All 138 teams

No. 16 · Big Ten

Penn State

Nittany Lions · 2026 preseason dossier

4M tierPlayoff4M-INTELLIGENCE-1.5
4M score740–100 index
Power rating+13.7vs. average
Projected wins8.2regular season
ScheduleNo. 601 = hardest
Playoff chance29.6%10,000 season sims
Inside the 4M numberFive ways this team can win—or get exposed.

Each index is standardized across FBS. Fifty is national average; context and matchup still decide the bet.

Offense63
Defense58
Roster55
Players60
Special teams72
Data confidence89%4M-INTELLIGENCE-1.5

The 2026 outlook

Will line play and quarterback consistency survive the Big Ten's deepest tier of contenders?

Penn State opens No. 16 nationally and No. 5 of 18 in the Big Ten. The 4M baseline rates the roster 13.7 points above an average FBS team on a neutral field and projects 8.2 regular-season wins.

Penn State has a credible playoff profile, but not enough separation to absorb repeated mistakes. Its best version can win a high-level matchup; the question is whether that version appears often enough to navigate the conference race without spending the playoff margin for error too early.

The roster grades comfortably above the national average. The personnel question is not whether there is talent; it is whether new starters can inherit the high-leverage jobs—quarterback decisions, pass protection, third-down coverage and pass-rush production—without an early efficiency drop.

The schedule grades No. 60 nationally—enough resistance to expose weaknesses without defining the entire year. A small group of swing games should determine whether Penn State beats its 8.2-win projection, placing extra value on special teams, fourth-down decisions and late-game quarterback play.

Personnel command center

Who is back, who arrived and who has to matter.

The roster is grouped by continuity because returning snaps and proven transfer production are more useful than raw headcount. “New / unverified” means the player did not match last season's roster or the incoming portal file—not that the player is necessarily a freshman.

Head coachMatt Campbell37–27 over the available CFBD career window
Staff continuityNew head coachReplaces James Franklin
Portal ledger38 in · 48 outImpact is weighted by rating, position and prior usage.
Position-group modelPremium roles separated.Fifty is FBS average. Quarterback includes the modeled starter probability, not merely the best name in the room.
Quarterback65
Offensive line51
Receivers47
Defensive front52
Secondary50
InRocco BechtQB · from Iowa State · 4★
InBenjamin BrahmerTE · from Iowa State · 4★
InChase SowellWR · from Iowa State · 4★
InCaleb BaconLB · from Iowa State · 4★
InMarcus Neal Jr.S · from Iowa State · 4★
InBrett EskildsenWR · from Iowa State · 3★
InIkenna EzeoguDL · from Iowa State · 3★
InJames PeoplesRB · from Ohio State · 3★
InGabe BurkleTE · from Iowa State · 3★
InCarson HansenRB · from Iowa State · 3★
InCooper AlexanderTE · from Iowa State · 3★
InJeremiah CooperS · from Iowa State · 3★
4M player valueHighest-leverage rolesMaximum point value assumes the player is fully unavailable and is reduced by status probability.
QBRocco Becht4.9 pts94% starter · usage + PPA + WEPA + portal role + QB starter probability
RBCarson Hansen0.8 pts84% expected role · usage + PPA + WEPA + portal role
WRChase Sowell0.7 pts51% expected role · usage + PPA + portal role
TEAndrew Rappleyea0.7 pts51% expected role · usage + PPA + roster continuity
WRKeith Jones Jr.0.7 pts49% expected role · usage + PPA + portal role
TEGabe Burkle0.7 pts48% expected role · usage + PPA + portal role
PlayerPos.4M valueSizeContinuity
#3Rocco BechtWesley Chapel, FLQB4.9 pts94% starter · 76% conf.6′1″ · 208 lbTransfer infrom Iowa State
#21Carson HansenLakeville, MNRB0.8 pts84% role · 76% conf.6′2″ · 216 lbTransfer infrom Iowa State
#0Chase SowellHumble, TXWR0.7 pts51% role · 64% conf.6′3″ · 203 lbTransfer infrom Iowa State
#15Keith Jones Jr.New Orleans, LAWR0.7 pts49% role · 64% conf.6′4″ · 197 lbTransfer infrom Grambling
#84Gabe BurkleCedar Rapids, IATE0.7 pts48% role · 64% conf.6′6″ · 247 lbTransfer infrom Iowa State
#18Benjamin BrahmerPierce, NETE0.7 pts48% role · 64% conf.6′7″ · 250 lbTransfer infrom Iowa State
#4Brett EskildsenFrisco, TXWR0.7 pts47% role · 64% conf.6′1″ · 198 lbTransfer infrom Iowa State
#51Brock RikerBrock, TXOL0.5 pts38% role · 40% conf.6′4″ · 291 lbTransfer infrom Texas State
#74Kuol Kuol IICenterville, OHOL0.5 pts38% role · 40% conf.6′6″ · 291 lbTransfer infrom Iowa State
#70Trevor BuhrWashington, MOOL0.5 pts38% role · 40% conf.6′4″ · 318 lbTransfer infrom Iowa State
#72Tyshon HuffCincinnati, OHOL0.5 pts38% role · 40% conf.6′4″ · 292 lbTransfer infrom Tiffin University
#54Vaea IkakoulaLaie, HIOL0.5 pts38% role · 40% conf.6′3″ · 326 lbTransfer infrom Iowa State
#66Will TompkinsCedar Falls, IAOL0.5 pts38% role · 40% conf.6′5″ · 311 lbTransfer infrom Iowa State
#33Alexander McPhersonStuart, FLDE0.5 pts38% role · 40% conf.6′6″ · 254 lbTransfer infrom Colorado
#1Ikenna EzeoguBlue Springs, MODE0.5 pts38% role · 40% conf.6′5″ · 273 lbTransfer infrom Iowa State
#56Alijah CarnellHenderson, NVDT0.5 pts38% role · 40% conf.6′5″ · 299 lbTransfer infrom Iowa State
#91Armstrong NnodimMesquite, TXDT0.5 pts38% role · 40% conf.6′2″ · 310 lbTransfer infrom Oklahoma State
#98Dallas VakalahiWest Valley, UTDT0.5 pts38% role · 40% conf.6′2″ · 326 lbTransfer infrom Utah
#99Keanu WilliamsClovis, CADT0.5 pts38% role · 40% conf.6′5″ · 317 lbTransfer infrom UCLA
#92Siale TaupakiEast Oakland, CADT0.5 pts38% role · 40% conf.6′2″ · 326 lbTransfer infrom UCLA
#80Cooper AlexanderWashington, OKTE0.5 pts42% role · 64% conf.6′4″ · 241 lbTransfer infrom Iowa State
#8Karon BrookinsPennsauken, NJWR0.4 pts38% role · 40% conf.6′5″ · 205 lbTransfer infrom Iowa State
#2Zay RobinsonDes Moines, IAWR0.4 pts38% role · 40% conf.5′11″ · 186 lbTransfer infrom Iowa State
#29Hunter SowellHumble, TXCB0.4 pts38% role · 40% conf.5′10″ · 180 lbTransfer infrom Iowa State
#24Ibn McDanielsElizabeth, NJS0.4 pts38% role · 40% conf.6′3″ · 202 lbTransfer infrom Syracuse
#3Jamison PattonDes Moines, IAS0.4 pts38% role · 40% conf.6′2″ · 206 lbTransfer infrom Iowa State
#4Jeremiah CooperEl Paso, TXS0.4 pts38% role · 40% conf.6′0″ · 188 lbTransfer infrom Iowa State
#31Marcus Neal Jr.Kansas City, MOS0.4 pts38% role · 40% conf.6′1″ · 216 lbTransfer infrom Iowa State
#27Omarion DavisCharlotte, NCS0.4 pts38% role · 40% conf.5′11″ · 198 lbTransfer infrom Boston College
#1James PeoplesSan Antonio, TXRB0.4 pts52% role · 76% conf.5′10″ · 214 lbTransfer infrom Ohio State
#9Cael BrezinaDowners Grove, ILLB0.4 pts38% role · 40% conf.6′3″ · 233 lbTransfer infrom Iowa State
#10Caleb BaconLake Mills, IALB0.4 pts38% role · 40% conf.6′4″ · 242 lbTransfer infrom Iowa State
#34Chris FileppoDoylestown, PALB0.4 pts38% role · 40% conf.6′4″ · 219 lbTransfer infrom West Virginia
#8Kooper EbelHartley, IALB0.4 pts38% role · 40% conf.6′4″ · 233 lbTransfer infrom Iowa State
#95Cristiano RosaShelton, CTPK0.3 pts38% role · 40% conf.5′11″ · 205 lbTransfer infrom James Madison
#38Nathan TiyceGerringong, NSWP0.3 pts38% role · 40% conf.6′5″ · 232 lbTransfer infrom Mississippi State
#10Connor BarryVienna, VAQB0.2 pts4% starter · 40% conf.6′1″ · 211 lbTransfer infrom Christopher Newport
#7Alex ManskeAlgona, IAQB0.1 pts4% starter · 64% conf.6′3″ · 210 lbTransfer infrom Iowa State
#87Andrew RappleyeaMillbrook, NYTE0.7 pts51% role · 64% conf.6′4″ · 242 lbReturning
#6Koby HowardPensacola, FLWR0.7 pts49% role · 64% conf.5′11″ · 203 lbReturning
#68Anthony DonkohAldie, VAOL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′5″ · 334 lbReturning
#55Chimdy OnohBaltimore, MDOL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′5″ · 320 lbReturning
#50Cooper CousinsErie, PAOL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′6″ · 320 lbReturning
#52Dominic RulliBurlington, KYOL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′3″ · 298 lbReturning
#79Donnie HarbourMilwaukee, WIOL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′3″ · 333 lbReturning
#71Garrett SextonHartland, WIOL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′6″ · 315 lbReturning
#67Henry BoehmeBirmingham, ALOL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′5″ · 285 lbReturning
#65Jim FitzgeraldSeverna Park, MDOL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′7″ · 337 lbReturning
#61Liam HoranWest Chester, PAOL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′3″ · 292 lbReturning
#78Malachi GoodmanBloomfield, NJOL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′6″ · 330 lbReturning
#77Owen AlicieneCheshire, CTOL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′7″ · 303 lbReturning
#47Aidan ProbstErie, PADE0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′2″ · 246 lbReturning
#93Bobby MearsWest Chester, PADE0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′4″ · 257 lbReturning
#43Dayshaun BurnettPittsburgh, PADE0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′3″ · 226 lbReturning
#11LaVar Arrington IIAnnapolis, MDDE0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′3″ · 220 lbReturning
#42Mason RobinsonRandallstown, MDDE0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′3″ · 255 lbReturning
#18Max GranvilleSugar Land, TXDE0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′3″ · 252 lbReturning
#19Yvan KemajouBurtonsville, MDDE0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′3″ · 252 lbReturning
#73Caleb BrewerReading, PADT0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′4″ · 295 lbReturning
#94De'Andre CookWashington, DCDT0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′4″ · 298 lbReturning
#90Liam AndrewsBrookline, MADT0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′4″ · 276 lbReturning
#39Ty BlandingBronx, NYDT0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′1″ · 301 lbReturning
#82Ethan BlackDavidsville, PAWR0.5 pts44% role · 40% conf.5′9″ · 178 lbReturning
#31Logan CunninghamBelle Vernon, PAWR0.5 pts44% role · 40% conf.5′8″ · 183 lbReturning
#11Lyrick SamuelBrooklyn, NYWR0.5 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′4″ · 183 lbReturning
#7Peter GonzalezMars, PAWR0.5 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′2″ · 211 lbReturning
#83Brian KortovichWilloughby, OHTE0.5 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′4″ · 241 lbReturning
#89Finn FurmanekState College, PATE0.5 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′3″ · 251 lbReturning
#2Audavion CollinsCovington, GACB0.5 pts44% role · 40% conf.5′11″ · 183 lbReturning
#5Daryus DixsonPerris, CACB0.5 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′0″ · 184 lbReturning
#16Donte NastasiState College, PACB0.5 pts44% role · 40% conf.5′10″ · 169 lbReturning
#23Jahmir JosephNyack, NYCB0.5 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′0″ · 190 lbReturning
#15Joshua JohnsonIronton, OHCB0.5 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′2″ · 189 lbReturning
#35Tyler ArmsteadCanonsburg, PACB0.5 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′1″ · 177 lbReturning
#12Xxavier ThomasCanonsburg, PACB0.5 pts44% role · 40% conf.5′11″ · 180 lbReturning
#7Zion TracyHempstead, NYCB0.5 pts44% role · 40% conf.5′11″ · 184 lbReturning
#21Vaboue TourePleasantville, NJS0.5 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′1″ · 209 lbReturning
#25Alex TatschLatrobe, PALB0.4 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′2″ · 235 lbReturning
#26Cam SmithSalem, NJLB0.4 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′0″ · 222 lbReturning
#13Tony RojasFairfax, VALB0.4 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′2″ · 236 lbReturning
#26Cam WallaceMount Vernon, GARB0.4 pts44% role · 40% conf.5′9″ · 206 lbReturning
#25Quinton Martin Jr.Belle Vernon, PARB0.4 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′1″ · 212 lbReturning
#94Ryan BarkerLandenberg, PAPK0.3 pts44% role · 52% conf.6′2″ · 191 lbReturning
#98Matthew ParkerYork, PAPK0.3 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′0″ · 224 lbReturning
#92Andrew DufaultWestwood, MALS0.3 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′1″ · 249 lbReturning
#35Blaise Sokach-MinnickWest Pittston, PALS0.3 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′3″ · 216 lbReturning
#19Jack LambertHampstead, NCQB0.2 pts4% starter · 40% conf.6′3″ · 202 lbReturning
#76Hunter AlbrightHollidaysburg, PAOL0.3 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′5″ · 326 lbNew / unverified
#56Mason BandhauerFort Collins, COOL0.3 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′6″ · 297 lbNew / unverified
#75Pete EglitisColumbus, OHOL0.3 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′7″ · 295 lbNew / unverified
#89Jackson FordPhoenixville, PADE0.3 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′5″ · 264 lbNew / unverified
#88Elijah ReederBayville, NJDL0.3 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′6″ · 210 lbNew / unverified
#19Amarion JacksonOmaha, NEWR0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′2″ · 192 lbNew / unverified
#81Ben WhitverPowhatan, VAWR0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′2″ · 195 lbNew / unverified
#13Hank LustigState College, PAWR0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.5′9″ · 170 lbNew / unverified
#17Josiah ZayasPiscataway, NJCB0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′2″ · 205 lbNew / unverified
#37Max HeffnerBirdsboro, PACB0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.5′11″ · 176 lbNew / unverified
#20Tyrell ChatmanLincoln, NECB0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′2″ · 196 lbNew / unverified
#28Bryson WilliamsOmaha, NES0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′4″ · 188 lbNew / unverified
#30Christian AskewKathleen, GAS0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′4″ · 199 lbNew / unverified
#41Jake LaVerdeKirtland, OHS0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′2″ · 210 lbNew / unverified
#46Evan WolffMoscow, PALB0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′2″ · 215 lbNew / unverified
#40Jake LukacState College, PALB0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′1″ · 210 lbNew / unverified
#32John KlostermanIowa City, IALB0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.5′11″ · 223 lbNew / unverified
#45Josh BanksHollidaysburg, PALB0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′1″ · 200 lbNew / unverified
#40Keian KaiserSidney, NELB0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′4″ · 215 lbNew / unverified
#12Kase EvansLexington, TXQB0.2 pts4% starter · 28% conf.6′3″ · 200 lbNew / unverified
#14Peyton FalzoneNazareth, PAQB0.2 pts4% starter · 28% conf.6′5″ · 216 lbNew / unverified
#36Amar'e GloverMiddletown, DERB0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′0″ · 205 lbNew / unverified
#29D'Antae SheffeyState College, PARB0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.5′11″ · 201 lbNew / unverified
#37Jeremy WashingtonWashington, DCRB0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.— · —New / unverified
#96Lucas TenbrockSt. Charles, ILP0.1 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′6″ · 210 lbNew / unverified

2026 schedule

The path that shapes the projection.

The model prices every scheduled game individually. Home field, neutral sites, completed results and opponent rating feed the expected-win total shown above.

Range of outcomes

The projection is the middle—not the ceiling.

Floor case6 wins

Instability at premium positions turns swing games into losses.

4M midpoint8 wins

The roster performs close to its current power and schedule baseline.

Ceiling case10 wins

Quarterback play and line continuity outperform the preseason prior.

The betting lens

Price and matchup decide the play.

No team is an automatic bet or fade. The goal is to identify when the market's story about Penn State diverges from the football conditions required to cover.

Back them when

The matchup preserves the talent edge, the opponent cannot create pressure with four, and the price has not already charged a contender tax.

Pass or fade when

The case rests on ranking, résumé or home-field narrative rather than a repeatable down-to-down advantage.

Watch first

Early-down success rate, pressure allowed and defensive explosive-play rate. Two stable categories would justify an upgrade.

Season-defining questionWill line play and quarterback consistency survive the Big Ten's deepest tier of contenders?