← All 138 teams

No. 51 · Big Ten

Minnesota

Golden Gophers · 2026 preseason dossier

4M tierBowl upside4M-INTELLIGENCE-1.5
4M score550–100 index
Power rating+3.1vs. average
Projected wins5regular season
ScheduleNo. 351 = hardest
Playoff chance0%10,000 season sims
Inside the 4M numberFive ways this team can win—or get exposed.

Each index is standardized across FBS. Fifty is national average; context and matchup still decide the bet.

Offense40
Defense45
Roster59
Players56
Special teams27
Data confidence89%4M-INTELLIGENCE-1.5

The 2026 outlook

Will line play and quarterback consistency survive the Big Ten's deepest tier of contenders?

Minnesota opens No. 51 nationally and No. 12 of 18 in the Big Ten. The 4M baseline rates the roster 3.1 points above an average FBS team on a neutral field and projects 5 regular-season wins.

Minnesota sits near the model's break-even line, where quarterback development and close-game execution matter more than brand. A bowl is attainable, but the margin is too thin to assume last year's record—or a splashy transfer class—will repeat without supporting efficiency.

There are enough playable pieces to compete, but the roster needs a dependable identity. Stable quarterback efficiency or an obvious line-of-scrimmage advantage would lift the ceiling. Portal additions matter only if their roles translate into protection, pressure or explosive-play creation.

The schedule grades No. 35 nationally—enough resistance to expose weaknesses without defining the entire year. A small group of swing games should determine whether Minnesota beats its 5-win projection, placing extra value on special teams, fourth-down decisions and late-game quarterback play.

Personnel command center

Who is back, who arrived and who has to matter.

The roster is grouped by continuity because returning snaps and proven transfer production are more useful than raw headcount. “New / unverified” means the player did not match last season's roster or the incoming portal file—not that the player is necessarily a freshman.

Head coachP.J. Fleck40–25 over the available CFBD career window
Staff continuityReturning head coachContinuity is treated as context, not an automatic upgrade.
Portal ledger19 in · 20 outImpact is weighted by rating, position and prior usage.
Position-group modelPremium roles separated.Fifty is FBS average. Quarterback includes the modeled starter probability, not merely the best name in the room.
Quarterback55
Offensive line51
Receivers55
Defensive front52
Secondary50
InXion ChapmanDL · from Florida International · 4★
InPerry ThompsonWR · from Auburn · 4★
InSid KabaDL · from Marshall · 3★
InTJ Bush Jr.EDGE · from California · 3★
InAydan WestCB · from Michigan State · 3★
InBennett WarrenOT · from Tennessee · 3★
InNoah JenningsWR · from Cincinnati · 3★
InTJ Thomas Jr.RB · from Elon · 3★
InMekhai SmithS · from Lehigh · 3★
InParker KnutsonCB · from Southwest Minnesota State · 3★
InKaden HelmsTE · from Oklahoma · 3★
InNaquan CrowderDL · from Marshall · 3★
4M player valueHighest-leverage rolesMaximum point value assumes the player is fully unavailable and is reduced by status probability.
QBDrake Lindsey4.0 pts80% starter · usage + PPA + WEPA + roster continuity + QB starter probability
QBMichael Merdinger1.0 pts18% starter · usage + PPA + portal role + QB starter probability
RBDarius Taylor0.8 pts94% expected role · usage + PPA + WEPA + roster continuity
WRJalen Smith0.8 pts56% expected role · usage + PPA + roster continuity
WRJavon Tracy0.8 pts58% expected role · usage + PPA + roster continuity
RBTJ Thomas0.7 pts71% expected role · usage + PPA + portal role
PlayerPos.4M valueSizeContinuity
#12Michael MerdingerFort Lauderdale, FLQB1.0 pts18% starter · 64% conf.6′1″ · 205 lbTransfer infrom Liberty
#23TJ ThomasThomasville, GARB0.7 pts71% role · 64% conf.5′8″ · 190 lbTransfer infrom Elon
#25Zion SteptoeLittle Elm, TXWR0.7 pts49% role · 64% conf.5′11″ · 190 lbTransfer infrom Tulsa
#13Noah JenningsColumbia, SCWR0.6 pts48% role · 64% conf.6′0″ · 185 lbTransfer infrom Cincinnati
#3Perry ThompsonFoley, ALWR0.6 pts49% role · 64% conf.6′3″ · 210 lbTransfer infrom Auburn
#87Kaden HelmsBellevue, NETE0.6 pts41% role · 64% conf.6′4″ · 235 lbTransfer infrom Oklahoma
#68Bennett WarrenHouston, TXOL0.5 pts38% role · 40% conf.6′6″ · 290 lbTransfer infrom Tennessee
#70Naquan CrowderAliquippa, PADL0.5 pts38% role · 40% conf.6′1″ · 310 lbTransfer infrom Marshall
#92Sid KabaColumbus, OHDL0.5 pts38% role · 40% conf.6′1″ · 310 lbTransfer infrom Marshall
#3TJ Bush Jr.Woodbridge, VADL0.5 pts38% role · 40% conf.6′3″ · 265 lbTransfer infrom California
#90Xion ChapmanAllentown, PADL0.5 pts38% role · 40% conf.6′2″ · 305 lbTransfer infrom Florida International
#5Aydan WestGaithersburg, MDDB0.4 pts38% role · 40% conf.5′11″ · 190 lbTransfer infrom Michigan State
#26Elisha WestGermantown, MDDB0.4 pts38% role · 40% conf.5′10″ · 195 lbTransfer infrom Michigan State
#22Mekhai SmithLower Merion, PADB0.4 pts38% role · 40% conf.6′2″ · 210 lbTransfer infrom Lehigh
#20Parker KnutsonSartell, MNDB0.4 pts38% role · 40% conf.6′0″ · 190 lbTransfer infrom Southwest Minnesota State
#29Andrew MarshallCarroll, OHLB0.4 pts38% role · 40% conf.6′2″ · 240 lbTransfer infrom Eastern Michigan
#22Jaron ThomasElkhart, INRB0.3 pts38% role · 40% conf.5′11″ · 220 lbTransfer infrom Purdue
#92Beckham SunderlandNewport, KYPK0.3 pts38% role · 40% conf.6′2″ · 225 lbTransfer infrom Michigan
#37Zachary RobbinsSantaquin, UTP0.3 pts38% role · 40% conf.6′3″ · 210 lbTransfer infrom Utah State
#5Drake LindseyFayetteville, ARQB4.0 pts80% starter · 76% conf.6′5″ · 230 lbReturning
#1Darius TaylorDetroit, MIRB0.8 pts94% role · 76% conf.6′0″ · 215 lbReturning
#8Jalen SmithMankato, MNWR0.8 pts56% role · 64% conf.6′1″ · 195 lbReturning
#11Javon TracyIndianapolis, INWR0.8 pts58% role · 64% conf.6′0″ · 205 lbReturning
#19Pierce WalshDowners Grove, ILTE0.7 pts47% role · 64% conf.6′4″ · 250 lbReturning
#78Ashton BeersSlinger, WIOL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′6″ · 315 lbReturning
#56Brett CarrollOlathe, KSOL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′5″ · 320 lbReturning
#51Daniel ShippEastvale, CAOL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′5″ · 280 lbReturning
#65Greg JohnsonPrior Lake, MNOL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′6″ · 325 lbReturning
#58Jaden BallCarroll, OHOL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′5″ · 300 lbReturning
#55Jerome WilliamsOsseo, MNOL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′4″ · 320 lbReturning
#60Kaveon LeeChicago, ILOL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′5″ · 290 lbReturning
#75Mark HandyAlbuquerque, NMOL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′7″ · 320 lbReturning
#50Nathan RoyMukwonago, WIOL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′5″ · 305 lbReturning
#77Nick SpencePhoenix, AZOL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′6″ · 300 lbReturning
#59Tony NelsonTracy, MNOL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′6″ · 315 lbReturning
#96Abu TarawallieNew Hope, MNDL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′3″ · 285 lbReturning
#98Adam KissayiPalm Bay, FLDL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′8″ · 255 lbReturning
#0Anthony SmithShippensburg, PADL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′6″ · 285 lbReturning
#95Colin HansenByron, MNDL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′7″ · 250 lbReturning
#47Enoch AtewogbolaAvon, INDL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′4″ · 230 lbReturning
#1Jaxon HowardCrystal, MNDL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′4″ · 250 lbReturning
#56Jay'Quan StubbsCleveland, OHDL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′4″ · 285 lbReturning
#55Jaylin HicksHarlem, NYDL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′3″ · 260 lbReturning
#11Karter MenzHorace, NDDL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′5″ · 240 lbReturning
#50Mo OmonodeWest Lafayette, INDL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′0″ · 285 lbReturning
#94Mo SaineEden Prairie, MNDL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′4″ · 275 lbReturning
#33Rhett HlavackaFond Du Lac, WIDL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′5″ · 255 lbReturning
#93Riley SunramKindred, NDDL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′5″ · 305 lbReturning
#45Sam MacyChanhassen, MNDL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′5″ · 250 lbReturning
#99Theorin RandleHouston, TXDL0.6 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′2″ · 300 lbReturning
#2A.J. TurnerHampton, VARB0.5 pts58% role · 64% conf.6′0″ · 195 lbReturning
#7Bradley MartinoNaples, FLWR0.5 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′3″ · 180 lbReturning
#18Donielle HayesPensacola, FLWR0.5 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′0″ · 190 lbReturning
#88Jacob SimpsonJohnston, IATE0.5 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′4″ · 240 lbReturning
#82Julian JohnsonAurora, ILTE0.5 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′6″ · 250 lbReturning
#83Sam PetersMaple Grove, MNTE0.5 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′4″ · 250 lbReturning
#7Aidan GousbyLehigh Acres, FLDB0.5 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′0″ · 190 lbReturning
#9Garrison MonroeShakopee, MNDB0.5 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′0″ · 205 lbReturning
#17John NestorChicago, ILDB0.5 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′1″ · 205 lbReturning
#14Kerry BrownNaples, FLDB0.5 pts44% role · 40% conf.5′10″ · 190 lbReturning
#8Mike GeraldHouston, TXDB0.5 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′0″ · 190 lbReturning
#21Naiim ParrishFreehold, NJDB0.5 pts44% role · 40% conf.5′11″ · 175 lbReturning
#18Rhyland KellyWinnipeg, MBDB0.5 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′1″ · 200 lbReturning
#15Samuel MaduBronx, NYDB0.5 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′1″ · 180 lbReturning
#27Simon SeidlHugo, MNDB0.5 pts44% role · 40% conf.5′10″ · 180 lbReturning
#4Zack HardenCovington, GADB0.5 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′1″ · 200 lbReturning
#13Zahir RainerRichmond, VADB0.5 pts44% role · 40% conf.5′9″ · 190 lbReturning
#2Emmanuel KarmoMinneapolis, MNLB0.4 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′2″ · 225 lbReturning
#44Ethan StendelCaledonia, MNLB0.4 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′3″ · 235 lbReturning
#19Joey GerlachWoodbury, MNLB0.4 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′3″ · 225 lbReturning
#46Mason CarrierDetroit Lakes, MNLB0.4 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′3″ · 235 lbReturning
#49Matt KingsburyChicago, ILLB0.4 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′3″ · 230 lbReturning
#6Maverick BaranowskiPonce Inlet, FLLB0.4 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′2″ · 230 lbReturning
#35Nate ClevelandHoffman Estates, ILLB0.4 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′2″ · 225 lbReturning
#21Grant WashingtonAvon, OHRB0.4 pts44% role · 40% conf.5′10″ · 200 lbReturning
#9Xavier FordLeesville, LARB0.4 pts44% role · 40% conf.5′10″ · 210 lbReturning
#36Daniel JacksonAlexandria, MNPK0.3 pts44% role · 40% conf.5′10″ · 175 lbReturning
#42Tom WestonPerthP0.3 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′3″ · 215 lbReturning
#80Alan SoukupPhoenix, AZLS0.3 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′1″ · 210 lbReturning
#43Jakob LutzPeachtree City, GALS0.3 pts44% role · 40% conf.6′0″ · 195 lbReturning
#14Dylan WittkeBuford, GAQB0.2 pts4% starter · 40% conf.6′1″ · 215 lbReturning
#6Max ShikenjanskiStillwater, MNQB0.2 pts4% starter · 40% conf.6′2″ · 185 lbReturning
#57Aaron ThomasPhoenix, AZOL0.3 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′5″ · 295 lbNew / unverified
#79Andrew TroutCold Spring, MNOL0.3 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′7″ · 300 lbNew / unverified
#66Beckett SchreiberMadison, WIOL0.3 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′5″ · 295 lbNew / unverified
#69Gavin MeierJanesville, WIOL0.3 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′5″ · 305 lbNew / unverified
#71Lucas TielschCopley, OHOL0.3 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′7″ · 320 lbNew / unverified
#48Aaden AytchLafayette, INDL0.3 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′3″ · 240 lbNew / unverified
#41Anthony CharlesPittsburgh, PADL0.3 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′5″ · 205 lbNew / unverified
#91Howie JohnsonForest Lake, MNDL0.3 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′3″ · 300 lbNew / unverified
#97Jeremiah BensonDetroit, MIDL0.3 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′2″ · 255 lbNew / unverified
#88Josiah AnyansiAtlanta, GADL0.3 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′2″ · 240 lbNew / unverified
#17Braiden StevensPlatte City, MOWR0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.5′8″ · 170 lbNew / unverified
#84Hayden MooreGainesville, FLWR0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′0″ · 190 lbNew / unverified
#81Josiah DozierMoody, ALWR0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′1″ · 190 lbNew / unverified
#89Quayd HendryxBurlington Township, NJWR0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.5′11″ · 180 lbNew / unverified
#85Rico BlassingameAuburn, WAWR0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′1″ · 170 lbNew / unverified
#86Gabe WeaverSt. Louis, MOTE0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′5″ · 240 lbNew / unverified
#44George RohlEllsworth, WITE0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′6″ · 245 lbNew / unverified
#4Roman VossLakefield, MNTE0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′4″ · 235 lbNew / unverified
#24Chance PayneJefferson, GADB0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.5′10″ · 180 lbNew / unverified
#31Jordan LampkinsGermantown, MDDB0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′0″ · 190 lbNew / unverified
#25Justin HopkinsNashville, TNDB0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.5′11″ · 180 lbNew / unverified
#23Lamont HamiltonRacine, WIDB0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.5′10″ · 170 lbNew / unverified
#36Tavian WhiteWaukee, IADB0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.5′11″ · 180 lbNew / unverified
#28Trason RichardsonHouston, TXDB0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′0″ · 180 lbNew / unverified
#32Angel LucianoSteelton, PALB0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′1″ · 210 lbNew / unverified
#16Hudson DunnPeoria, AZLB0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′0″ · 220 lbNew / unverified
#16Brady PalmerSan Diego, CAQB0.2 pts4% starter · 28% conf.6′2″ · 200 lbNew / unverified
#15Owen LansuDowners Grove, ILQB0.2 pts4% starter · 28% conf.6′1″ · 195 lbNew / unverified
#28Niko CastilloSchuylkill Haven, PARB0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.6′1″ · 235 lbNew / unverified
#20Ryan EstradaEl Paso, TXRB0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.5′10″ · 190 lbNew / unverified
#26Zeke BatesHaverford, PARB0.2 pts20% role · 28% conf.5′11″ · 215 lbNew / unverified

2026 schedule

The path that shapes the projection.

The model prices every scheduled game individually. Home field, neutral sites, completed results and opponent rating feed the expected-win total shown above.

Range of outcomes

The projection is the middle—not the ceiling.

Floor case3 wins

Instability at premium positions turns swing games into losses.

4M midpoint5 wins

The roster performs close to its current power and schedule baseline.

Ceiling case7 wins

Quarterback play and line continuity outperform the preseason prior.

The betting lens

Price and matchup decide the play.

No team is an automatic bet or fade. The goal is to identify when the market's story about Minnesota diverges from the football conditions required to cover.

Back them when

The number is below a full possession and Minnesota's best unit attacks a verified opponent weakness.

Pass or fade when

The offense must play from behind, protect for long-yardage throws and generate explosives simply to reach the market expectation.

Watch first

Early-down success rate, pressure allowed and defensive explosive-play rate. Two stable categories would justify an upgrade.

Season-defining questionWill line play and quarterback consistency survive the Big Ten's deepest tier of contenders?